Abstract
Abstract. The article presents the results of field experiments to study the effect of foliar dressing on the yield of soybean seeds. The studies were carried out at the FSC ZBK in 2018-2020. In a field experiment on a dark gray forest heavy loamy soil, we studied the reaction of two soybean varieties (Leader-1 and Mezenka) to treatment with the highly effective inoculant Rizoform and foliar application with Ultramag combi microfertilizer and the amino acid biostimulator Biostim oilseed. The experimental design included the following options: control (without inoculation and treatment), seed dressing with Scarlet fungicide, basic treatment (Scarlet and Rizoform inoculant), basic treatment in combination with one and two foliar dressings with the studied preparations. The experiment was repeated four times. Experimental plots area – 10 m2. Sowing was carried out with a SKS-6-10 seeder in a wide-row method (row spacing - 45 cm) in the second decade of May. Seeding rate - 600 thousand viable seeds/ha. According to the results of the experiment, a positive effect of the tested preparations on the formation of the yield of soybean seeds was established. The most effective in terms of the factor of treatments was the option with the use of two foliar dressings with Ultramag combi and Biostim oleaginous at a dose of 0.5 l/ha. The increase in yield on average for the experience was 9.4% in relation to the control. According to the cultivar factor, the Leader 1 cultivar showed a higher yield - 2.87 t/ha versus 2.67 t/ha of the Mezenka cultivar. The responsiveness of the Mezenka variety to carrying out corrective dressing was higher than that of the Leader 1 variety (11.5 and 6.4%, respectively). The profitability of soybean cultivation was 83 - 106%. The economic effect when carrying out two leaf treatments amounted to 2,490 rubles for the Leader 1 variety and 4900 rubles for the Mezenka variety
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Tested preparations positively affected soybean seed yield.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- tested preparationse0
- Outcome
- yield of soybean seedse0
- Direction
- positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“a positive effect of the tested preparations on the formation of the yield of soybean seeds was established”
Claim · model-written summary
Two foliar dressings with Ultramag combi and Biostim oleaginous gave a 9.4% yield increase versus control.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- two foliar dressings with Ultramag combi and Biostim oleaginous at a dose of 0.5 l/hae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 9.4%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most effective in terms of the factor of treatments was the option with the use of two foliar dressings with Ultramag combi and Biostim oleaginous at a dose of 0.5 l/ha. The increase in yield on average for the experience was 9.4% in relation to the control.”
t0“SOYBEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Leader 1 soybean yielded 2.87 t/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Leader 1e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.87 t/hae0
- Comparator
- Mezenkae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the Leader 1 cultivar showed a higher yield - 2.87 t/ha versus 2.67 t/ha of the Mezenka cultivar”
t0“SOYBEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Mezenka soybean yielded 2.67 t/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Mezenkae0
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Value
- 2.67 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2.67 t/ha of the Mezenka cultivar”
t0“SOYBEAN”
e1“a positive effect of the tested preparations on the formation of the yield of soybean seeds was established”
Claim · model-written summary
Mezenka yield response to corrective dressing was 11.5%.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Mezenkae0
- Treatment
- corrective dressinge0
- Outcome
- responsivenesse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 11.5e0
- Comparator
- Leader 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The responsiveness of the Mezenka variety to carrying out corrective dressing was higher than that of the Leader 1 variety (11.5 and 6.4%, respectively)”
t0“SOYBEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Leader 1 yield response to corrective dressing was 6.4%.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Leader 1e0
- Treatment
- corrective dressinge0
- Outcome
- responsivenesse0
- Value
- 6.4%e0
- Comparator
- Mezenkae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The responsiveness of the Mezenka variety to carrying out corrective dressing was higher than that of the Leader 1 variety (11.5 and 6.4%, respectively)”
t0“SOYBEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean cultivation profitability ranged from 83 to 106%.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Value
- 83 - 106%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The profitability of soybean cultivation was 83 - 106%”
Claim · model-written summary
Two leaf treatments had an economic effect of 2,490 rubles for Leader 1.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Leader 1e0
- Treatment
- two leaf treatmentse0
- Outcome
- economic effecte0
- Value
- 2,490 rublese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The economic effect when carrying out two leaf treatments amounted to 2,490 rubles for the Leader 1 variety”
t0“SOYBEAN”
Claim · model-written summary
Two leaf treatments had an economic effect of 4900 rubles for Mezenka.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Material
- Mezenkae0
- Treatment
- two leaf treatmentse1
- Outcome
- economic effecte1
- Value
- 4900 rublese0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“4900 rubles for the Mezenka variety”
t0“SOYBEAN”
e1“The economic effect when carrying out two leaf treatments amounted to 2,490 rubles for the Leader 1 variety”
The same questions in other papers
application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
331 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
400 papers more in this group
See all 404 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.