Abstract
Early blight is one of the most common and destructive diseases in tomatoes caused by the fungus Alternaria solani. Antifungal activity of six botanical extracts, namely (Datura stramonium) Datura, (Polyalthia longifolia) Ashoka, (Clerodendrum viscosum) wild jasmine, (Eucalyptus globulus) eucalyptus, (Chromolaena odorata), Siam weed extract, (Lantana camera) wild sage extract was antifungal. Each plant extract tested against Alternaria solani, with two concentrations, 5% and 10%, under in vitro and in vivo. The maximum decrease in the growth of mycelium of Alternaria solani with Eucalyptus globulus and Lantana camara (67.68% and 36.72%, respectively) and the minimum disease intensity under in vivo were recorded with Eucalyptus globulus (27.42%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Six botanical extracts showed antifungal activity.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Interactor
- Alternaria solani
Alternaria solanit0pathogen - Outcome
- Antifungal activitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Antifungal activity of six botanical extracts, namely (Datura stramonium) Datura, (Polyalthia longifolia) Ashoka, (Clerodendrum viscosum) wild jasmine, (Eucalyptus globulus) eucalyptus, (Chromolaena odorata), Siam weed extract, (Lantana camera) wild sage extract was antifungal.”
t0“tomato incited by Alternaria solani”
Claim · model-written summary
Eucalyptus globulus extract reduced Alternaria solani mycelial growth by 67.68%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Eucalyptus globuluse0
- Interactor
- Alternaria solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- growth of mycelium of Alternaria solanie0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 67.68%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum decrease in the growth of mycelium of Alternaria solani with Eucalyptus globulus and Lantana camara (67.68% and 36.72%, respectively) and the minimum disease intensity under in vivo were recorded with Eucalyptus globulus (27.42%).”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Lantana camara extract reduced Alternaria solani mycelial growth by 36.72%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Lantana camarae0
- Interactor
- Alternaria solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- growth of mycelium of Alternaria solanie0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 36.72%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum decrease in the growth of mycelium of Alternaria solani with Eucalyptus globulus and Lantana camara (67.68% and 36.72%, respectively) and the minimum disease intensity under in vivo were recorded with Eucalyptus globulus (27.42%).”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Eucalyptus globulus treatment gave the minimum in vivo disease intensity of 27.42%.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Eucalyptus globuluse0
- Interactor
- Alternaria solaniAlternaria solanie0pathogen
- Outcome
- disease intensitye0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 27.42%e0
- Qualifier
- in vivoe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum decrease in the growth of mycelium of Alternaria solani with Eucalyptus globulus and Lantana camara (67.68% and 36.72%, respectively) and the minimum disease intensity under in vivo were recorded with Eucalyptus globulus (27.42%).”
t0“tomato”
The same questions in other papers
Lantana camara · Alternaria solani · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.