Paper · 2014 · Journal of Biotechnology Research Center

Evaluation the efficiency of Soil Solarization, Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma viride, Paecilomyces lilacinus, Glomus mosseae and nematicide furfural against root-knot nematode Meliodogyne javanica on tomato plants

Mohmmed J. Hanawi; Bassim Sh. Hamad; Zaid NajI Hassan; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study has been conducted to evaluate the interactive effect of soil solarization, Trichodema harzianum, Trichoderma viride, Paecilomyces lilacinus, Glomus mosseae and Furural on root- knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica on tomato. The results revealed that there were significant effects of solarization alone or in combination with the other control agents on all tested growth parameters of tomato plants. The length of stem and root were 10.6, 12, 5.2, 5.7cm with solarization and non-solarization soils respectively. There were synergistic interaction between solarizaton and control agents, the length of stem and root in Furfural, T. harzianum, T. viride, P. lilacinus, G. mosseae treatmens were (25.3 , 38.2),(18.8 , 29.2),( 15.8 ,17.3), ( 15.2 , 23.1), (13.8,18.8) cm with solarization and (14.7 , 15.2) , (15.4, 21.5 ) , (12.1, 12.1 ) , (9.8,15.1) , (11.2,11.3) cm with non- solarization respectively. The solarization was found to be efficient in reducing the number of root knots per one gram of root of tomato with synergistic interaction with all control agents especially Furural. Generally, Furural has significant superiority in its effect on all growth parameter, followed by T.harzianum, and it was the most effective in reducing number of root-knot (5.6,29) knots for solarized and unsolarized soil respectively followed by T. harzianum , P. lilacinus, .G. mosseae( 42,45,49 )knots /gm roots with solarization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization affected tomato growth parameters significantly.

Treatment
solarizatione0
Outcome
growth parameters of tomato plantse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant effects of solarization alone or in combination with the other control agents on all tested growth parameters of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With solarization, stem length was 10.6 versus 5.2 cm without solarization.

Treatment
solarizatione0
Outcome
length of steme0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
10.6e0
Qualifier
5.2e0
Comparator
non-solarization soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The length of stem and root were 10.6, 12, 5.2, 5.7cm with solarization and non-solarization soils respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 205–218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With solarization, root length was 12 versus 5.7 cm without solarization.

Treatment
solarizatione0
Outcome
length of stem and roote0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
12e0
Qualifier
5.7cme0
Comparator
non-solarization soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The length of stem and root were 10.6, 12, 5.2, 5.7cm with solarization and non-solarization soils respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 205–218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarization reduced root knots per gram of tomato root, synergistically with control agents, especially Furural.

Treatment
solarizatione0
Outcome
number of root knots per one gram of root of tomatoe0
Direction
reducinge0
Qualifier
synergistic interaction with all control agents especially Fururale0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The solarization was found to be efficient in reducing the number of root knots per one gram of root of tomato with synergistic interaction with all control agents especially Furural.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1098 · show in text ↑

solarization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

solarization · organism · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.