Paper · 2020 · Agrica

Effect of various carbon sources on in vitro morphogenetic responses in sugarcane

Yukti Gupta; NN Tiwari; Madan Lal; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Leaf sheath explants of sugarcane variety CoS 99259 were inoculated on agar gelled (8.0 g/l) Murashige and Skoog’s (MS) medium containing 3.0 mg/l of 2, 4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D). Different sources of carbon viz., sucrose, glucose, mill sugar, sugar cubes, and fructose were separately added into the medium each at a concentration of 20 g/l. The result showed that maximum 64.4% of leaf sheath explants initiated callus within 3 weeks of inoculation on medium containing sucrose followed by sugar cubes (59.9%). The best growth of callus was also observed in presence of sucrose followed by sugar cubes. The frequency of callus formation in presence of mill sugar, glucose, and fructose was significantly low. The actively growing calli were transferred on MS shoot proliferation medium supplemented with BAP and Kinetin (0.5mg/leach) along with respective sources of carbon. The result revealed the highest induction of shoot primordia in 64.4% callus culture in presence of sucrose followed by 59.6% in the presence of sugar cubes, within 4-6 weeks of transfer. The highest number of shoot per culture (21.3) was recorded on the medium containing sucrose followed by sugar cubes (16.8) which was statistically similar. The explants showed poor responses regarding callus formation, shoot regeneration /and shoot growth on the medium containing mill sugar, glucose or fructose as carbon source.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose gave the maximum callus induction frequency of 64.4% within three weeks.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
leaf sheath explantse0
Treatment
medium containing sucrosee0
Outcome
leaf sheath explants initiated calluse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
64.4%e0
Comparator
sugar cubese0

Verbatim

e0

“maximum 64.4% of leaf sheath explants initiated callus within 3 weeks of inoculation on medium containing sucrose followed by sugar cubes (59.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar cubes gave a callus induction frequency of 59.9%, second to sucrose.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
leaf sheath explantse0
Treatment
sugar cubese0
Outcome
leaf sheath explants initiated calluse0
Value
59.9%e0
Comparator
sucrosee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“maximum 64.4% of leaf sheath explants initiated callus within 3 weeks of inoculation on medium containing sucrose followed by sugar cubes (59.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose produced the best callus growth.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sucrosee0
Outcome
growth of calluse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
sugar cubese0

Verbatim

e0

“The best growth of callus was also observed in presence of sucrose followed by sugar cubes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus formation frequency with mill sugar was significantly low.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
mill sugare0
Outcome
frequency of callus formatione0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The frequency of callus formation in presence of mill sugar, glucose, and fructose was significantly low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus formation frequency with glucose was significantly low.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
glucosee0
Outcome
frequency of callus formatione0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The frequency of callus formation in presence of mill sugar, glucose, and fructose was significantly low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus formation frequency with fructose was significantly low.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
fructosee0
Outcome
frequency of callus formatione0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The frequency of callus formation in presence of mill sugar, glucose, and fructose was significantly low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose induced shoot primordia in 64.4% of callus cultures within four to six weeks.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sucrosee0
Outcome
induction of shoot primordiae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
64.4%e0
Qualifier
within 4-6 weeks of transfere0
Comparator
sugar cubese0

Verbatim

e0

“highest induction of shoot primordia in 64.4% callus culture in presence of sucrose followed by 59.6% in the presence of sugar cubes, within 4-6 weeks of transfer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar cubes induced shoot primordia in 59.6% of callus cultures.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugar cubese0
Outcome
induction of shoot primordiae0
Value
59.6%e0
Qualifier
within 4-6 weeks of transfere0
Comparator
sucrosee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“highest induction of shoot primordia in 64.4% callus culture in presence of sucrose followed by 59.6% in the presence of sugar cubes, within 4-6 weeks of transfer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose produced the highest shoot number, 21.3 per culture.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
medium containing sucrosee0
Outcome
number of shoot per culturee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.3e0
Comparator
sugar cubese0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of shoot per culture (21.3) was recorded on the medium containing sucrose followed by sugar cubes (16.8) which was statistically similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar cubes produced 16.8 shoots per culture, statistically similar to sucrose.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugar cubese0
Outcome
number of shoot per culturee0
Direction
statistically similare0
Value
16.8e0
Comparator
sucrosee0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of shoot per culture (21.3) was recorded on the medium containing sucrose followed by sugar cubes (16.8) which was statistically similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mill sugar gave poor callus formation, shoot regeneration and shoot growth.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
mill sugare0
Outcome
callus formation, shoot regeneration /and shoot growthe0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The explants showed poor responses regarding callus formation, shoot regeneration /and shoot growth on the medium containing mill sugar, glucose or fructose as carbon source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose gave poor callus formation, shoot regeneration and shoot growth.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
glucosee0
Outcome
callus formation, shoot regeneration /and shoot growthe0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The explants showed poor responses regarding callus formation, shoot regeneration /and shoot growth on the medium containing mill sugar, glucose or fructose as carbon source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructose gave poor callus formation, shoot regeneration and shoot growth.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
fructosee0
Outcome
callus formation, shoot regeneration /and shoot growthe0
Direction
poore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The explants showed poor responses regarding callus formation, shoot regeneration /and shoot growth on the medium containing mill sugar, glucose or fructose as carbon source.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–81 · show in text ↑

sucrose · molecular: expression · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sucrose · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

in vitro · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 59 positive, 8 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.