Paper · 2021 · FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Tillage shapes the soil and rhizosphere microbiome of barley—but not its susceptibility towards Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei

Nina Bziuk; Lorrie Maccario; Dimitar Douchkov; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Long-term agricultural practices are assumed to shape the rhizosphere microbiome of crops with implications for plant health. In a long-term field experiment, we investigated the effect of different tillage and fertilization practices on soil and barley rhizosphere microbial communities by means of amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene fragments from total community DNA. Differences in the microbial community composition depending on the tillage practice, but not the fertilization intensity were revealed. To examine whether these soil and rhizosphere microbiome differences influence the plant defense response, barley (cultivar Golden Promise) was grown in field or standard potting soil under greenhouse conditions and challenged with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh). Amplicon sequence analysis showed that preceding tillage practice, but also aboveground Bgh challenge significantly influenced the microbial community composition. Expression of plant defense-related genes PR1b and PR17b was higher in challenged compared to unchallenged plants. The Bgh infection rates were strikingly lower for barley grown in field soil compared to potting soil. Although previous agricultural management shaped the rhizosphere microbiome, no differences in plant health were observed. We propose therefore that the management-independent higher microbial diversity of field soils compared to potting soils contributed to the low infection rates of barley.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley rhizosphere microbial community composition differed with tillage practice but not with fertilization intensity.

Treatment
tillage practicee1
Outcome
microbial community compositione1
Direction
Differencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil and barley rhizosphere microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–287 · show in text ↑
e1

“Differences in the microbial community composition depending on the tillage practice, but not the fertilization intensity were revealed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley defense-related gene expression (PR1b and PR17b) was higher in plants challenged with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei than in unchallenged plants.

Treatment
challenged with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordeie7
Interactor
Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordeiBlumeria hordeie7pathogen
Gene
PR1b and PR17be2
Outcome
Expression of plant defense-related genese2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
unchallenged plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil and barley rhizosphere microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–287 · show in text ↑
e2

“Expression of plant defense-related genes PR1b and PR17b was higher in challenged compared to unchallenged plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1058 · show in text ↑
e7

“barley (cultivar Golden Promise) was grown in field or standard potting soil under greenhouse conditions and challenged with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grown in field soil had strikingly lower Bgh infection rates than barley grown in potting soil.

Material
Golden Promisee7
Treatment
field soile3
Interactor
Bghe3pathogen
Outcome
Bgh infection ratese3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
potting soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil and barley rhizosphere microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–287 · show in text ↑
e3

“The Bgh infection rates were strikingly lower for barley grown in field soil compared to potting soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1161 · show in text ↑
e7

“barley (cultivar Golden Promise) was grown in field or standard potting soil under greenhouse conditions and challenged with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–779 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground Bgh challenge significantly influenced barley rhizosphere microbial community composition.

Treatment
aboveground Bgh challengee4
Outcome
microbial community compositione4
Direction
significantly influencede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil and barley rhizosphere microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–287 · show in text ↑
e4

“Amplicon sequence analysis showed that preceding tillage practice, but also aboveground Bgh challenge significantly influenced the microbial community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–943 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous agricultural management did not change barley plant health despite shaping the rhizosphere microbiome.

Treatment
previous agricultural managemente5
Outcome
plant healthe5
Direction
no differencese5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil and barley rhizosphere microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–287 · show in text ↑
e5

“Although previous agricultural management shaped the rhizosphere microbiome, no differences in plant health were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1284 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Preceding tillage practice significantly influenced barley rhizosphere microbial community composition.

Treatment
preceding tillage practicee4
Outcome
microbial community compositione4
Direction
significantly influencede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil and barley rhizosphere microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–287 · show in text ↑
e4

“Amplicon sequence analysis showed that preceding tillage practice, but also aboveground Bgh challenge significantly influenced the microbial community composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–943 · show in text ↑

Blumeria hordei · molecular: expression · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

infection · molecular: expression · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.