Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Production Potential and Economics of Bt. Cotton based Intercropping System under Rainfed Condition

D. S. Hirpara; V. D. Vora; P. D. Vekaria; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat during kharif- 2015-16 to 2018-19. The experiment comprising of eight treatments with four replications laid out in randomized block design. In pooled results, the treatment inter cropping of cotton + cowpea(T8) produced significantly higher MCEY (2815 kg/ha), which was statistically at par with treatment T6 (cotton + sesame), T3 (cotton + green gram), T4 (cotton + black gram) and T2 (cotton + groundnut).Among the intercrops, maximum main product yield (1074 kg/ha) was recorded with treatment T5 (cotton + gum guar) followed by cotton + soybean (896 kg/ha) and cotton + groundnut (884 kg/ha), whereas T3 (cotton + green gram) produced minimum seed yield (388 kg/ha) with cotton. Among the intercrops, gum guar recorded maximum by product yield 2609 kg/ha followed by groundnut haulm yield 2534 kg/ha and minimum by product yield 608 kg/ha recorded by green gram as intercrop with cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton + cowpea intercropping gave significantly higher MCEY (2815 kg/ha) than the other intercrops in pooled results.

Taxon
Bt. cottone0
Treatment
inter cropping of cotton + cowpea(T8)e1
Outcome
MCEYe1
Direction
highere1
Value
2815 kg/hae1
Qualifier
statistically at par with treatment T6 (cotton + sesame), T3 (cotton + green gram), T4 (cotton + black gram) and T2 (cotton + groundnut)e1
Setting
Targhadia, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment inter cropping of cotton + cowpea(T8) produced significantly higher MCEY (2815 kg/ha), which was statistically at par with treatment T6 (cotton + sesame), T3 (cotton + green gram), T4 (cotton + black gram) and T2 (cotton + groundnut)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton + gum guar intercropping (T5) gave the maximum main product yield (1074 kg/ha) among the intercrops.

Taxon
Bt. cottone0
Treatment
T5 (cotton + gum guar)e2
Outcome
main product yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
1074 kg/hae2
Setting
Targhadia, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the intercrops, maximum main product yield (1074 kg/ha) was recorded with treatment T5 (cotton + gum guar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton + soybean intercropping gave the next-highest main product yield (896 kg/ha) after cotton + gum guar.

Taxon
Bt. cottone0
Treatment
cotton + soybeane3
Outcome
main product yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
896 kg/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the intercrops, maximum main product yield (1074 kg/ha) was recorded with treatment T5 (cotton + gum guar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–774 · show in text ↑
e3

“followed by cotton + soybean (896 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton + groundnut intercropping gave the main product yield of 884 kg/ha, after cotton + gum guar and cotton + soybean.

Taxon
Bt. cottone0
Treatment
cotton + groundnute4
Outcome
main product yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
884 kg/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among the intercrops, maximum main product yield (1074 kg/ha) was recorded with treatment T5 (cotton + gum guar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–774 · show in text ↑
e4

“and cotton + groundnut (884 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton + green gram intercropping (T3) gave the minimum seed yield (388 kg/ha) with cotton.

Taxon
Bt. cottone0
Treatment
T3 (cotton + green gram)e5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
minimume5
Value
388 kg/hae5
Setting
Targhadia, Gujarate0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 · show in text ↑
e5

“T3 (cotton + green gram) produced minimum seed yield (388 kg/ha) with cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gum guar as an intercrop gave the maximum by-product yield (2609 kg/ha).

Taxon
Bt. cottone0
Treatment
gum guare6
Outcome
by product yielde6
Direction
maximume6
Value
2609 kg/hae6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 · show in text ↑
e6

“gum guar recorded maximum by product yield 2609 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut as an intercrop gave a haulm yield of 2534 kg/ha, below gum guar.

Taxon
Bt. cottone0
Treatment
groundnute7
Outcome
haulm yielde7
Direction
higherinferrede7
Value
2534 kg/hae7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 · show in text ↑
e7

“groundnut haulm yield 2534 kg/ha and minimum by product yield 608 kg/ha recorded by green gram as intercrop with cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green gram as an intercrop gave the minimum by-product yield (608 kg/ha).

Taxon
Bt. cottone0
Treatment
green grame7
Outcome
by product yielde7
Direction
minimume7
Value
608 kg/hae7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted on medium black soil to study the production potential and economics of Bt. cotton based intercropping system under rain fed condition at Dry Farming Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Targhadia, Gujarat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 · show in text ↑
e7

“groundnut haulm yield 2534 kg/ha and minimum by product yield 608 kg/ha recorded by green gram as intercrop with cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1145 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.