Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soybean intercropping was less profitable than sole cotton.

A claim from Evaluation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)-based intercropping system through different approaches under rainfed conditions. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean intercropping was less profitable than sole cotton.

Treatment
soybeane0
Outcome
profitablee0
Direction
not profitablee0
Comparator
sole crop of cottone0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of sesame, soybean or groundnut are not profitable than the sole crop of cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1202

Title

Evaluation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)-based intercropping system through different approaches under rainfed conditions.

P. Raghu Rami Reddy; Shaik Mohammad The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2009

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-abbe31bb5bbc02f2837e6cdc3d9429c899f05f058c4ec3d97504c93d1f92a8d5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

Glycine max · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.