Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Diversification in Cotton Based Cropping System under Mechanization in Rainfed Condition of Vidarbha of Maharashtra, India

A.B. Turkhede; M.B. Nagdeve; A.P. Karunakar; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 2013-14 to 2016-17 at All India Coordinator Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.). Treatments consist of seven cropping patterns and two nutrients management tested in split plot design with three replications. On the basis of pooled analysis, the results revealed that, among the various treatments combination Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus soybean followed by safflower with 100% RDF had higher cotton equivalent yield than other combinations.

Treatment
Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer)e0
Outcome
cotton equivalent yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2103 and 1824 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatments combinationse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus soybean followed by safflower with 100% RDF had higher net monetary returns than other combinations.

Treatment
Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer)e0
Outcome
net monetary returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatments combinationse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus soybean followed by safflower with 100% RDF had higher B:C ratio than other combinations.

Treatment
Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer)e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.01 and 1.75e0
Comparator
rest of the treatments combinationse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus soybean followed by safflower with 100% RDF had higher RWUE than other combinations.

Treatment
Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer)e0
Outcome
RWUEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.91 and 2.52e0
Comparator
rest of the treatments combinationse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus soybean followed by safflower with 100% RDF had higher sustainable value than other combinations.

Treatment
Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer)e0
Outcome
sustainable valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.94 and 0.81e0
Comparator
rest of the treatments combinationse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus soybean followed by safflower with 100% RDF had higher yield index than other combinations.

Treatment
Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer)e0
Outcome
yield indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.85 and 0.61e0
Comparator
rest of the treatments combinationse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus soybean followed by safflower with 100% RDF had higher system productivity than other combinations.

Treatment
Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer)e0
Outcome
system productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatments combinationse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plus soybean followed by safflower with 100% RDF had higher profitability than other combinations.

Treatment
Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer)e0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1e0
Comparator
rest of the treatments combinationse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton + soybean (4:10)-safflower with application of 100% RDF (through inorganic fertilizer) recorded significantly higher cotton equivalent yield (2103 and 1824 kg ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs45850 and 33394 ha-1), B:C ratio (2.01 and 1.75), RWUE (2.91 and 2.52), sustainable value and yield index (0.94 and 0.81 and 0.85 and 0.61), system productivity and profitability (8.25 and 7.43 kg ha-1 day-1 and 179.80 and 136.28 Rs ha-1 day-1) than rest of the treatments combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–889 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.