Paper · 2003 · PubMed

Rotylenchulus reniformis Management in Cotton with Crop Rotation.

R F Davis; S R Koenning; R C Kemerait; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
67
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One-year crop rotations with corn or highly resistant soybean were evaluated at four locations for their effect on Rotylenchulus reniformis population levels and yield of a subsequent cotton crop. Four nematicide (aldicarb) regimes were included at two of the locations, and rotation with reniform-susceptible soybean was included at the other two locations. One-year rotations to corn or resistant soybean resulted in lower R. reniformis population levels (P </= 0.05) than those found in cotton at three test sites. However, the effect of rotation on nematode populations was undetectable by mid-season when cotton was grown the following year. Cotton yield following a one-year rotation to resistant soybean increased at all test locations compared to continuous cotton, and yield following corn increased at three locations. The optimum application rate for aldicarb in this study was 0.84 kg a.i./ha in furrow. Side-dress applications of aldicarb resulted in yield increases that were insufficient to cover the cost of application in 3 of the 4 years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One-year rotations to corn or resistant soybean lowered Rotylenchulus reniformis population levels relative to cotton at three test sites.

Treatment
One-year rotations to corn or resistant soybeane1
Interactor
R. reniformisRotylenchulus reniformise1pest
Outcome
R. reniformis population levelse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
those found in cottone1
Setting
three test sitese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScot Nelson · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“One-year rotations to corn or resistant soybean resulted in lower R. reniformis population levels (P </= 0.05) than those found in cotton at three test sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of rotation on nematode populations was undetectable by mid-season when cotton was grown the following year.

Treatment
rotatione2
Interactor
nematodeNematodae2pest
Outcome
the effect of rotation on nematode populationse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“However, the effect of rotation on nematode populations was undetectable by mid-season when cotton was grown the following year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield after a one-year rotation to resistant soybean increased at all test locations compared with continuous cotton.

Treatment
a one-year rotation to resistant soybeane3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
continuous cottone3
Setting
all test locationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Cotton yield following a one-year rotation to resistant soybean increased at all test locations compared to continuous cotton, and yield following corn increased at three locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield following a one-year rotation to corn increased at three locations.

Treatment
corne3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
three locationse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Cotton yield following a one-year rotation to resistant soybean increased at all test locations compared to continuous cotton, and yield following corn increased at three locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–827 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum in-furrow aldicarb application rate was 0.84 kg a.i./ha.

Treatment
aldicarbe4
Outcome
optimum application rate for aldicarbe4
Value
0.84 kg a.i./hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“One-year rotations to corn or resistant soybean resulted in lower R. reniformis population levels (P </= 0.05) than those found in cotton at three test sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–516 · show in text ↑
e4

“The optimum application rate for aldicarb in this study was 0.84 kg a.i./ha in furrow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Side-dress aldicarb applications gave yield increases that were insufficient to cover the cost of application in 3 of the 4 years.

Treatment
Side-dress applications of aldicarbe5
Outcome
yield increasese5
Direction
increasese5
Qualifier
insufficient to cover the cost of application in 3 of the 4 yearse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“One-year rotations to corn or resistant soybean resulted in lower R. reniformis population levels (P </= 0.05) than those found in cotton at three test sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–516 · show in text ↑
e5

“Side-dress applications of aldicarb resulted in yield increases that were insufficient to cover the cost of application in 3 of the 4 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1055 · show in text ↑

aldicarb · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · Rotylenchulus reniformis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 26 positive, 17 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

rotation · Rotylenchulus reniformis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.