Paper · 2004 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen, Aldicarb, and Cover Crop Effects on Cotton Yield and Fiber Properties

Philip J. Bauer; Mitchell E. Roof

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Thrips, primarily Frankliniella spp., can damage cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of winter cover crops on thrips populations in cotton and to assess the yield and fiber quality response to cover crops and N fertilizer rate with and without thrips protection. A field experiment was conducted on a Bonneau loamy sand soil (loamy, siliceous, thermic, Arenic Paleudult) from 1996 through 1998. Treatments were cover crops, N fertilizer rate, and aldicarb rate. Cover crops were rye ( Secale cereale L.), crimson clover ( Trifolium incarnatum L.), a clover + rye mixture, and winter fallow. Nitrogen levels were 0, 78, and 112 kg N ha −1 . Aldicarb levels were 0 and 1.18 kg a.i. ha −1 . Aldicarb reduced thrips populations. For plots without aldicarb, differences among winter covers occurred at one sampling time in 1998 when fallow had more thrips than the other three winter covers. Aldicarb increased yield by 9% in 1996, 48% in 1997, and 35% in 1998. In 1997 and 1998, yield increases with aldicarb were greater in the winter cover and N treatment combinations that provided higher total N to the crop. The 0 kg N ha −1 rate tended to have lower yield, fiber length, length uniformity, fiber strength, micronaire, and Hunter's +b than the other two N rates. Aldicarb generally increased the value of these fiber properties each year. Including agronomic practices in assessing control measures may improve integrated pest management strategies for thrips in conservation tillage systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb reduced thrips populations.

Treatment
Aldicarbe0
Outcome
thrips populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aldicarb reduced thrips populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without aldicarb, fallow had more thrips than the three winter covers at one sampling in 1998.

Outcome
thripse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the other three winter coverse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For plots without aldicarb, differences among winter covers occurred at one sampling time in 1998 when fallow had more thrips than the other three winter covers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb increased cotton yield by 9% in 1996, 48% in 1997, and 35% in 1998.

Treatment
Aldicarbe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9% in 1996, 48% in 1997, and 35% in 1998e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aldicarb increased yield by 9% in 1996, 48% in 1997, and 35% in 1998.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb yield increases were greater with winter cover and nitrogen combinations supplying higher total nitrogen in 1997 and 1998.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
aldicarbe0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
greatere0

Verbatim

e0

“In 1997 and 1998, yield increases with aldicarb were greater in the winter cover and N treatment combinations that provided higher total N to the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero nitrogen tended to produce lower cotton yield and fiber length, uniformity, strength, micronaire, and Hunter’s +b than the other rates.

Treatment
0 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
yield, fiber length, length uniformity, fiber strength, micronaire, and Hunter's +be0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other two N ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 0 kg N ha −1 rate tended to have lower yield, fiber length, length uniformity, fiber strength, micronaire, and Hunter's +b than the other two N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb generally increased the listed fiber properties each year.

Treatment
Aldicarbe0
Outcome
fiber propertiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aldicarb generally increased the value of these fiber properties each year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1404 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest considering agronomic practices when assessing thrips control in conservation tillage.

Treatment
Including agronomic practicese0
Outcome
integrated pest management strategiese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Including agronomic practices in assessing control measures may improve integrated pest management strategies for thrips in conservation tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1558 · show in text ↑

aldicarb · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

aldicarb · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

aldicarb · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.