Paper · 2020 · Research Biotica

Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane

G. Thiyagarajan; M. Manikandan

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments conducted in sugarcane revealed that scheduling irrigation through drip daily at 80 percent of pan evaporation (PE) registered the highest cane yield (168.2 t ha-1) in main of cv. CO 86032 which was followed by 60 and 40 percent drip irrigation (148.5 and 140.9 t ha-1 respectively) and were significantly superior over surface method of irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio (126.2 t ha-1). In the ratoon crop, drip irrigation treatments at 40, 60 and 80 percent level of pan evaporation produced comparable cane yields (124.4, 131.7 and 128.9 t ha-1 respectively). Highest water use efficiency was observed in 40% PE treatment for both main crop and ratoon (150.3 and 146.8 kg ha mm-1 respectively). Nitrogen levels did not show any marked difference on cane yield and application of 175 kg N ha-1 as fertigation was found to be optimum and economical.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation scheduled daily at 80% of pan evaporation gave the highest main-crop cane yield, 168.2 t ha-1, in cv. CO 86032.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
CO 86032e0
Treatment
scheduling irrigation through drip daily at 80 percent of pan evaporatione0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
168.2 t ha-1e0
Comparator
60 and 40 percent drip irrigatione1

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“scheduling irrigation through drip daily at 80 percent of pan evaporation (PE) registered the highest cane yield (168.2 t ha-1) in main of cv. CO 86032”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–206 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was followed by 60 and 40 percent drip irrigation (148.5 and 140.9 t ha-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 60 and 40 percent of pan evaporation gave lower cane yields, 148.5 and 140.9 t ha-1, than the 80% level.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
60 and 40 percent drip irrigatione1
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
148.5 and 140.9 t ha-1e1
Comparator
drip daily at 80 percent of pan evaporatione0

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“scheduling irrigation through drip daily at 80 percent of pan evaporation (PE) registered the highest cane yield (168.2 t ha-1) in main of cv. CO 86032”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–206 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was followed by 60 and 40 percent drip irrigation (148.5 and 140.9 t ha-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation significantly outperformed surface irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio in cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
drip irrigatione1
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
superiore2
Qualifier
126.2 t ha-1e2
Comparator
surface method of irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratioe2

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“scheduling irrigation through drip daily at 80 percent of pan evaporation (PE) registered the highest cane yield (168.2 t ha-1) in main of cv. CO 86032”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–206 · show in text ↑
e1

“which was followed by 60 and 40 percent drip irrigation (148.5 and 140.9 t ha-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–300 · show in text ↑
e2

“were significantly superior over surface method of irrigation at 0.75 IW/CPE ratio (126.2 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the ratoon crop, drip irrigation at 40, 60 and 80 percent of pan evaporation gave comparable cane yields.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoon crope3
Treatment
drip irrigation treatments at 40, 60 and 80 percent level of pan evaporatione3
Outcome
cane yieldse3
Direction
comparablee3
Value
124.4, 131.7 and 128.9 t ha-1e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the ratoon crop, drip irrigation treatments at 40, 60 and 80 percent level of pan evaporation produced comparable cane yields (124.4, 131.7 and 128.9 t ha-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40% PE drip treatment had the highest water use efficiency in the main crop, 150.3 kg ha mm-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
main crope4
Treatment
40% PE treatmente4
Outcome
water use efficiencye4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
150.3e4
Qualifier
kg ha mm-1 respectivelye4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest water use efficiency was observed in 40% PE treatment for both main crop and ratoon (150.3 and 146.8 kg ha mm-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40% PE drip treatment had the highest water use efficiency in the ratoon crop, 146.8 kg ha mm-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
ratoone4
Treatment
40% PE treatmente4
Outcome
water use efficiencye4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
146.8 kg ha mm-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“Highest water use efficiency was observed in 40% PE treatment for both main crop and ratoon (150.3 and 146.8 kg ha mm-1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels showed no marked difference in cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Nitrogen levelse5
Outcome
cane yielde5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nitrogen levels did not show any marked difference on cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–778 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 175 kg N ha-1 as fertigation was found to be optimum and economical for sugarcane.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
application of 175 kg N ha-1 as fertigatione6
Outcome
optimum and economicale6

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Drip Irrigation System and Fertigation of Nitrogen in Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“application of 175 kg N ha-1 as fertigation was found to be optimum and economical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–865 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 118 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.