Paper · 2020 · Nigerian Journal of Animal Production

Influence of anaerobic rumen fungal inoculation on the fermentation and nutritive content of selected forage silages

O. J. Idowu; A. S. Chaudhry; J. Dolfing; et al.

9
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study investigated the ability of isolated anaerobic fungi to facilitate silage fermentation characteristic and nutritive content. To achieve this, two fungal isolates out of fourteen obtained in our laboratory from sheep rumen content were selected as silage inoculants. Selection of the isolates was based on their ability to present the highest growth characteristics and they belong to the genus Orpinomyces, and Neocallimastix (as identified with microscope). The two fungi alongside the control (i.e. no fungi) were used to inoculate different silages prepared from four selected forages i.e. two tropical grasses (i.e. Andropogon gayanus- AG, Brachiaria decumbens- BD) and two temperate forages (i.e. Triticum aestivum- TA straw and Lolium perenne- LP) in order to examine their effect on fermentation (i.e. pH) and nutritive content of these silages over 14 and 28 days of inoculation, respectively. The anaerobic fungal inoculated silages showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement in quality than un-inoculated silages which was reflected in terms of increase in soluble fraction i.e. CP content; reduction in fibre content; increase in metabolites, increase in total antioxidant content (TAC); and reduction in pH with minimal nutrient loss. However, the rate of the anaerobic fungal improvement was influenced by the forages used for the silage and the length of inoculation. The highest and lowest increase in quality was recorded in LP and TA silages, respectively, while more extended inoculation time supported more quality improvement in the silages. The use of anaerobic fungi as inoculants improved AG, BD, TA and LP silages quality through facilitation of the fermentation characteristics (i.e. pH and nutritive content).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anaerobic fungal inoculation increased CP content of silages compared with un-inoculated silages.

Taxon
foragese1
Treatment
anaerobic fungal inoculated silagese2
Interactor
anaerobic fungie0symbiont
Outcome
CP contente2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
un-inoculated silagese2

Verbatim

e0

“anaerobic fungi to facilitate silage fermentation characteristic and nutritive content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e2

“The anaerobic fungal inoculated silages showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement in quality than un-inoculated silages which was reflected in terms of increase in soluble fraction i.e. CP content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anaerobic fungal inoculation reduced fibre content of silages.

Taxon
foragese1
Treatment
anaerobic fungal inoculated silagese2
Interactor
anaerobic fungie0symbiont
Outcome
fibre contente3
Direction
reductione3
Comparator
un-inoculated silagese2

Verbatim

e0

“anaerobic fungi to facilitate silage fermentation characteristic and nutritive content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e2

“The anaerobic fungal inoculated silages showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement in quality than un-inoculated silages which was reflected in terms of increase in soluble fraction i.e. CP content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1109 · show in text ↑
e3

“reduction in fibre content; increase in metabolites, increase in total antioxidant content (TAC); and reduction in pH with minimal nutrient loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anaerobic fungal inoculation increased metabolites in silages.

Taxon
foragese1
Treatment
anaerobic fungal inoculated silagese2
Interactor
anaerobic fungie0symbiont
Outcome
metabolitese3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
un-inoculated silagese2

Verbatim

e0

“anaerobic fungi to facilitate silage fermentation characteristic and nutritive content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e2

“The anaerobic fungal inoculated silages showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement in quality than un-inoculated silages which was reflected in terms of increase in soluble fraction i.e. CP content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1109 · show in text ↑
e3

“reduction in fibre content; increase in metabolites, increase in total antioxidant content (TAC); and reduction in pH with minimal nutrient loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anaerobic fungal inoculation increased total antioxidant content (TAC) of silages.

Taxon
foragese1
Treatment
anaerobic fungal inoculated silagese2
Interactor
anaerobic fungie0symbiont
Outcome
total antioxidant content (TAC)e3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
un-inoculated silagese2

Verbatim

e0

“anaerobic fungi to facilitate silage fermentation characteristic and nutritive content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e2

“The anaerobic fungal inoculated silages showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement in quality than un-inoculated silages which was reflected in terms of increase in soluble fraction i.e. CP content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1109 · show in text ↑
e3

“reduction in fibre content; increase in metabolites, increase in total antioxidant content (TAC); and reduction in pH with minimal nutrient loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anaerobic fungal inoculation reduced silage pH with minimal nutrient loss.

Taxon
foragese1
Treatment
anaerobic fungal inoculated silagese2
Interactor
anaerobic fungie0symbiont
Outcome
pHe3
Direction
reductione3
Qualifier
minimal nutrient losse3
Comparator
un-inoculated silagese2

Verbatim

e0

“anaerobic fungi to facilitate silage fermentation characteristic and nutritive content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e2

“The anaerobic fungal inoculated silages showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement in quality than un-inoculated silages which was reflected in terms of increase in soluble fraction i.e. CP content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1109 · show in text ↑
e3

“reduction in fibre content; increase in metabolites, increase in total antioxidant content (TAC); and reduction in pH with minimal nutrient loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1255 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lolium perenne silage showed the highest increase in quality after anaerobic fungal inoculation.

Taxon
foragese1
Material
Lolium perennee4
Outcome
increase in qualitye5
Direction
higheste5

Verbatim

e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e4

“two temperate forages (i.e. Triticum aestivum- TA straw and Lolium perenne- LP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–764 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest and lowest increase in quality was recorded in LP and TA silages, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticum aestivum straw silage showed the lowest increase in quality after anaerobic fungal inoculation.

Taxon
foragese1
Material
Triticum aestivume4
Outcome
increase in qualitye5
Direction
loweste5

Verbatim

e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e4

“two temperate forages (i.e. Triticum aestivum- TA straw and Lolium perenne- LP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–764 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest and lowest increase in quality was recorded in LP and TA silages, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1482 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer inoculation time gave more quality improvement in the silages.

Taxon
foragese1
Treatment
extended inoculation timee6
Outcome
quality improvemente6
Direction
moree6

Verbatim

e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e6

“more extended inoculation time supported more quality improvement in the silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two selected anaerobic fungal isolates belong to the genera Orpinomyces and Neocallimastix.

Taxon
foragese1
Interactor
OrpinomycesOrpinomycese7symbiont
Second interactor
NeocallimastixNeocallimastixe7symbiont
Outcome
genuse7

Verbatim

e1

“silages prepared from four selected forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–598 · show in text ↑
e7

“they belong to the genus Orpinomyces, and Neocallimastix (as identified with microscope)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–468 · show in text ↑