Paper · 2021 · Revista Caatinga

IRRIGATION WITH SALINE WATER AND SILICATE FERTILIZATION IN THE CULTIVATION OF ‘GIGANTE AMARELO’ PASSION FRUIT1 2

GENILSON LIMA DINIZ; REGINALDO GOMES NOBRE; GEOVANI SOARES DE LIMA; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Brazilian Northeast region suffers from some abiotic stresses that are responsible for the loss of agricultural production, such as long drought periods and high evapotranspiration, associated with the quality of the water, which induces the use of saline water as an alternative for the expansion of irrigated areas, and silicate fertilization contributes to reduce the effects of salinity under the Northeastern semi -arid conditions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the osmotic potential and physiological indices of yellow passion fruit seedlings under irrigation water salinity and silicate fertilization. The experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions at the Federal University of Campina Grande, Pombal -PB, Brazil, in a randomized block design in a 5 x 5 factorial scheme, relative to five levels of electrical conductivity of irrigation water - ECw (0.3; 1.0; 1.7; 2.4 and 3.1 dS m-1) and five doses of silicate fertilization (0; 25; 50; 75 and 100 g silicon per plant) in four replicates and two plants per plot. The application of 50, 75 and 100 g silicon per plant reduced the osmotic potential in the leaf tissues of ‘Gigante Amarelo’ passion fruit plants. Water salinity lower than 1.3 dS m-1 resulted in an increase in chlorophyll b content; increase in carotenoid content was observed in plants subjected to silicon doses of 25 and 100 g per plant. Salinity levels above 1.1 dS m-1 compromised the performance of photosystem II of passion fruit plants when subjected to silicon doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon at 50 g per plant reduced leaf tissue osmotic potential.

Taxon
passion fruitPassiflora edulise0
Material
‘Gigante Amarelo’e0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
50e0
Outcome
osmotic potentiale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 50, 75 and 100 g silicon per plant reduced the osmotic potential in the leaf tissues of ‘Gigante Amarelo’ passion fruit plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon at 75 g per plant reduced leaf tissue osmotic potential.

Taxon
passion fruitPassiflora edulise0
Material
‘Gigante Amarelo’e0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
75 and 100 g silicon per plante0
Outcome
osmotic potentiale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 50, 75 and 100 g silicon per plant reduced the osmotic potential in the leaf tissues of ‘Gigante Amarelo’ passion fruit plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon at 100 g per plant reduced leaf tissue osmotic potential.

Taxon
passion fruitPassiflora edulise0
Material
‘Gigante Amarelo’e0
Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
100 g silicon per plante0
Outcome
osmotic potentiale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 50, 75 and 100 g silicon per plant reduced the osmotic potential in the leaf tissues of ‘Gigante Amarelo’ passion fruit plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation water salinity below 1.3 dS m-1 increased chlorophyll b content.

Taxon
PASSION FRUITPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
Water salinity lower than 1.3 dS m-1e0
Outcome
chlorophyll b contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water salinity lower than 1.3 dS m-1 resulted in an increase in chlorophyll b content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“PASSION FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A silicon dose of 25 g per plant increased carotenoid content.

Taxon
PASSION FRUITPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
silicon doses of 25 and 100 g per plante0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in carotenoid content was observed in plants subjected to silicon doses of 25 and 100 g per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“PASSION FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A silicon dose of 100 g per plant increased carotenoid content.

Taxon
PASSION FRUITPassiflora edulist0
Treatment
100 g per plante0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in carotenoid content was observed in plants subjected to silicon doses of 25 and 100 g per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1400 · show in text ↑
t0

“PASSION FRUIT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity above 1.1 dS m-1 compromised photosystem II performance under silicon doses.

Taxon
passion fruitPassiflora edulise0
Treatment
Salinity levels above 1.1 dS m-1e0
Outcome
performance of photosystem IIe0
Direction
compromisede0
Qualifier
when subjected to silicon dosese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Passiflora edulis
Passiflora edulis · TaxonRarani · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity levels above 1.1 dS m-1 compromised the performance of photosystem II of passion fruit plants when subjected to silicon doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1537 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.