Paper · 2021 · PLoS ONE

Modeling growth and development of hydroponically grown dill, parsley, and watercress in response to photosynthetic daily light integral and mean daily temperature

Kellie J. Walters; Roberto G. Lopez

14
claims
22
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In controlled environments, crop models that incorporate environmental factors can be developed to optimize growth and development as well as conduct cost and/or resource use benefit analyses. The overall objective of this study was to model growth and development of dill 'Bouquet' (Anethum graveolens), parsley 'Giant of Italy' (Petroselinum crispum), and watercress (Nasturtium officinale) in response to photosynthetic daily light integral (DLI) and mean daily temperature (MDT). Plants were grown hydroponically in five greenhouse compartments with MDTs ranging from 9.7 to 27.2 °C under 0%, 30%, or 50% shade cloth to create DLIs ranging from 6.2 to 16.9 mol·m‒2·d‒1. MDT and DLI interacted to influence dill fresh mass and height, and watercress maximum quantum yield of dark adapted leaves (Fv/Fm), height, and branch number while only MDT affected dill leaf number and watercress fresh mass and branch length. Besides dry matter concentration (DMC), parsley was influenced by MDT and not DLI. Increasing MDT from ≈10 to 22.4 °C (parsley) or 27.2 °C (dill and watercress), linearly or near-linearly increased fresh mass. For dill, increasing DLI decreased fresh mass when MDT was low (9.7 to 13.9 °C) and increased fresh mass when MDT was high (18.4 to 27.2 °C). DMC of dill, parsley, and watercress increased as MDT decreased or DLI increased, indicating a higher proportion of plant fresh mass is water at higher MDTs or lower DLIs. With these data we have created growth and development models for culinary herbs to aid in predicting responses to DLI and MDT.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean daily temperature and daily light integral interacted in their effects on dill fresh mass and height.

Treatment
MDT and DLIe0
Outcome
fresh mass and heighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDT and DLI interacted to influence dill fresh mass and height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean daily temperature and daily light integral interacted in their effects on watercress Fv/Fm, height and branch number.

Treatment
MDT and DLIe1
Outcome
maximum quantum yield of dark adapted leaves (Fv/Fm), height, and branch numbere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nasturtium officinale
Nasturtium officinale · TaxonChirocca77 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“watercress maximum quantum yield of dark adapted leaves (Fv/Fm), height, and branch number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“daily light integral and mean daily temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑
t1

“daily light integral and mean daily temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“MDT and DLI interacted to influence dill fresh mass and height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only mean daily temperature affected dill leaf number.

Treatment
MDTe0
Outcome
leaf numbere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only MDT affected dill leaf number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–873 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only mean daily temperature affected watercress fresh mass and branch length.

Treatment
MDTe1
Outcome
fresh mass and branch lengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nasturtium officinale
Nasturtium officinale · TaxonChirocca77 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“watercress fresh mass and branch length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“mean daily temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–163 · show in text ↑
t1

“mean daily temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–163 · show in text ↑
e1

“MDT and DLI interacted to influence dill fresh mass and height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apart from dry matter concentration, parsley responded to mean daily temperature but not daily light integral.

Treatment
MDTe0
Outcome
parsley was influencede0
Comparator
DLIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides dry matter concentration (DMC), parsley was influenced by MDT and not DLI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mean daily temperature from about 10 to 22.4 °C increased parsley fresh mass.

Treatment
MDT from ≈10 to 22.4 °Ce0
Outcome
fresh masse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing MDT from ≈10 to 22.4 °C (parsley) or 27.2 °C (dill and watercress), linearly or near-linearly increased fresh mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mean daily temperature from about 10 to 27.2 °C increased dill fresh mass.

Treatment
MDTe0
Outcome
fresh masse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
27.2 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing MDT from ≈10 to 22.4 °C (parsley) or 27.2 °C (dill and watercress), linearly or near-linearly increased fresh mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mean daily temperature from about 10 to 27.2 °C increased watercress fresh mass.

Treatment
MDTe0
Outcome
fresh masse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
27.2 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nasturtium officinale
Nasturtium officinale · TaxonChirocca77 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing MDT from ≈10 to 22.4 °C (parsley) or 27.2 °C (dill and watercress), linearly or near-linearly increased fresh mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing daily light integral decreased dill fresh mass at low mean daily temperature.

Treatment
increasing DLIe0
Outcome
fresh masse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
MDT was low (9.7 to 13.9 °C)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For dill, increasing DLI decreased fresh mass when MDT was low (9.7 to 13.9 °C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing daily light integral increased dill fresh mass at high mean daily temperature.

Treatment
daily light integralt0
Outcome
fresh masse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
MDT was high (18.4 to 27.2 °C)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased fresh mass when MDT was high (18.4 to 27.2 °C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“dill, parsley, and watercress in response to photosynthetic daily light integral”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–136 · show in text ↑
t1

“dill, parsley, and watercress in response to photosynthetic daily light integral”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–136 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dill dry matter concentration increased as mean daily temperature decreased or daily light integral increased.

Treatment
MDT decreased or DLI increasede0
Outcome
DMCe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum graveolens
Anethum graveolens · TaxonTepeyac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMC of dill, parsley, and watercress increased as MDT decreased or DLI increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1351 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parsley dry matter concentration increased as mean daily temperature decreased or daily light integral increased.

Treatment
MDT decreased or DLI increasede0
Outcome
DMCe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petroselinum crispum
Petroselinum crispum · TaxonVítor Jorge · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMC of dill, parsley, and watercress increased as MDT decreased or DLI increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1351 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watercress dry matter concentration increased as mean daily temperature decreased or daily light integral increased.

Treatment
MDT decreased or DLI increasede0
Outcome
DMCe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nasturtium officinale
Nasturtium officinale · TaxonChirocca77 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DMC of dill, parsley, and watercress increased as MDT decreased or DLI increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1351 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The study created growth and development models for culinary herbs to predict responses to light and temperature.

Taxon
culinary herbse0
Outcome
growth and development modelse0
Value
DLI and MDTe0

Verbatim

e0

“With these data we have created growth and development models for culinary herbs to aid in predicting responses to DLI and MDT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1570 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Anethum graveolens (dill)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.