Paper · 2021 · Microbiome

Protists as main indicators and determinants of plant performance

Sai Guo; Wu Xiong; Xinnan Hang; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
146
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microbiomes play vital roles in plant health and performance, and the development of plant beneficial microbiomes can be steered by organic fertilizer inputs. Especially well-studied are fertilizer-induced changes on bacteria and fungi and how changes in these groups alter plant performance. However, impacts on protist communities, including their trophic interactions within the microbiome and consequences on plant performance remain largely unknown. Here, we tracked the entire microbiome, including bacteria, fungi, and protists, over six growing seasons of cucumber under different fertilization regimes (conventional, organic, and Trichoderma bio-organic fertilization) and linked microbial data to plant yield to identify plant growth-promoting microbes. RESULTS: Yields were higher in the (bio-)organic fertilization treatments. Soil abiotic conditions were altered by the fertilization regime, with the prominent effects coming from the (bio-)organic fertilization treatments. Those treatments also led to the pronounced shifts in protistan communities, especially microbivorous cercozoan protists. We found positive correlations of these protists with plant yield and the density of potentially plant-beneficial microorganisms. We further explored the mechanistic ramifications of these relationships via greenhouse experiments, showing that cercozoan protists can positively impact plant growth, potentially via interactions with plant-beneficial microorganisms including Trichoderma, the biological agent delivered by the bio-fertilizer. CONCLUSIONS: We show that protists may play central roles in stimulating plant performance through microbiome interactions. Future agricultural practices might aim to specifically enhance plant beneficial protists or apply those protists as novel, sustainable biofertilizers. Video abstract.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber yields were higher under bio-organic and organic fertilization.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
(bio-)organic fertilization treatmentse1
Outcome
Yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six growing seasons of cucumber under different fertilization regimes (conventional, organic, and Trichoderma bio-organic fertilization)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yields were higher in the (bio-)organic fertilization treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization regimes altered soil abiotic conditions, particularly the bio-organic and organic treatments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
(bio-)organic fertilization treatmentse1
Outcome
Soil abiotic conditionse1
Comparator
conventionale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six growing seasons of cucumber under different fertilization regimes (conventional, organic, and Trichoderma bio-organic fertilization)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil abiotic conditions were altered by the fertilization regime, with the prominent effects coming from the (bio-)organic fertilization treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-organic and organic fertilization shifted protistan communities, especially microbivorous cercozoan protists.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
organic, and Trichoderma bio-organic fertilizatione0
Interactor
microbivorous cercozoan protistse1symbiont
Outcome
pronounced shifts in protistan communitiese1
Comparator
conventionale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six growing seasons of cucumber under different fertilization regimes (conventional, organic, and Trichoderma bio-organic fertilization)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“Those treatments also led to the pronounced shifts in protistan communities, especially microbivorous cercozoan protists.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbivorous cercozoan protists were positively correlated with plant yield.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Interactor
microbivorous cercozoan protistse2symbiont
Outcome
plant yielde1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six growing seasons of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“We found positive correlations of these protists with plant yield and the density of potentially plant-beneficial microorganisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1251 · show in text ↑
e2

“microbivorous cercozoan protists”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbivorous cercozoan protists were positively correlated with density of potentially beneficial microorganisms.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Interactor
microbivorous cercozoan protistse2symbiont
Outcome
density of potentially plant-beneficial microorganismse1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six growing seasons of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“We found positive correlations of these protists with plant yield and the density of potentially plant-beneficial microorganisms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1251 · show in text ↑
e2

“microbivorous cercozoan protists”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse experiments found that cercozoan protists can increase plant growth, potentially through beneficial microorganisms including Trichoderma.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
cercozoan protistse1
Interactor
cercozoan protistse1symbiont
Second interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae1symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
positivelye1
Qualifier
potentially via interactions with plant-beneficial microorganisms including Trichodermae1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six growing seasons of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“greenhouse experiments, showing that cercozoan protists can positively impact plant growth, potentially via interactions with plant-beneficial microorganisms including Trichoderma, the biological agent delivered by the bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1562 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest enhancing or applying plant-beneficial protists as biofertilizers.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Interactor
plant beneficial protistse1symbiont
Outcome
enhance plant beneficial protists or apply those protists as novel, sustainable biofertilizerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“six growing seasons of cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–584 · show in text ↑
e1

“Future agricultural practices might aim to specifically enhance plant beneficial protists or apply those protists as novel, sustainable biofertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1839 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.