Paper · 2021 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Effect of Some Soil Conditioners on Snap Bean Growth Yield and Sandy Soil Properties

Rasha Attia; Dalal Sary

3
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

During 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons, two-field experiments were conducted at El-Kasasin Horticultural Research Station, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt, to test the impact of potassium humate(KH) and biochar with substitution part of recommended mineral fertilization on growth parameters, physical, chemical characteristics of pods and green yield of snap bean as well as some physical and chemical soil properties after harvesting. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with nine treatments included; solo application from 2 ton biochar+4 kg KH and 4 ton biochar+6 kg KH and each one was mixed with 25, 50 and 75% NPK from recommended dose comparing with 100% NPK. Overall, the results of this study indicated that soil addition of 75% NPK+ 4 ton biochar+6 kg KH recorded the best mean values of all tested parameters and improved growth, which reflected on yield and its components followed by 100% NPK.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil addition of 75% NPK with 4 ton biochar and 6 kg potassium humate recorded the best mean values of all tested parameters, compared with 100% NPK.

Taxon
Snap Beant0
Treatment
soil addition of 75% NPK+ 4 ton biochar+6 kg KHe0
Outcome
all tested parameterse0
Direction
best mean valuese0
Comparator
100% NPKe2
Setting
El-Kasasin Horticultural Research Station, Ismailia Governorate, Egypte1

Verbatim

t0

“Snap Bean Growth Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil addition of 75% NPK+ 4 ton biochar+6 kg KH recorded the best mean values of all tested parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-field experiments were conducted at El-Kasasin Horticultural Research Station, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–150 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved growth, which reflected on yield and its components followed by 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same soil treatment improved snap bean growth compared with 100% NPK.

Taxon
Snap Beant0
Treatment
soil addition of 75% NPK+ 4 ton biochar+6 kg KHe0
Outcome
growthe2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
100% NPKe2

Verbatim

t0

“Snap Bean Growth Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil addition of 75% NPK+ 4 ton biochar+6 kg KH recorded the best mean values of all tested parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–851 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved growth, which reflected on yield and its components followed by 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same soil treatment improved snap bean yield and its components compared with 100% NPK.

Taxon
Snap Beant0
Treatment
soil addition of 75% NPK+ 4 ton biochar+6 kg KHe0
Outcome
yield and its componentse2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
100% NPKe2

Verbatim

t0

“Snap Bean Growth Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil addition of 75% NPK+ 4 ton biochar+6 kg KH recorded the best mean values of all tested parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–851 · show in text ↑
e2

“improved growth, which reflected on yield and its components followed by 100% NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–937 · show in text ↑

biochar · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

biochar · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 121 positive, 22 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.