Claim · model-written summary
Solution Mn had no significant effect on dry matter distribution in 'GL'.
- Taxon
- bush beant0
- Material
- 'GL'e0
- Treatment
- Mn in the nutrient solutione0
- Outcome
- dry matter distributione0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“In Mn‐tolerant 'GL', Mn in the nutrient solution had no significant effect on dry matter distribution.”
t0“bush bean cultivars”
Title
Y. Kohno; C. D. Foy; A. L. Fleming; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 1984. doi:10.1080/01904168409363220
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Observation 'WC‐2' was much more sensitive to Mn toxicity than 'GL'.
- Intervention effect At 1.0 ppm Mn, 'WC‐2' total dry weight was reduced 31% versus 0.05 ppm Mn.
- Intervention effect 'GL' had no growth reduction under the same Mn conditions.
- Association Increasing solution Mn increased primary-leaf and stem dry matter distribution in 'WC‐2'.
- Association Increasing solution Mn decreased root dry matter distribution in 'WC‐2'.
- Association Tissue Mn rose in proportion to solution Mn in both cultivars.
- Observation 'GL' required a higher tissue Mn concentration than 'WC‐2' for toxicity symptoms.
- Intervention effect Mn treatment did not affect leaf Fe concentration in either cultivar.
- Observation 'WC‐2' tended to accumulate more Mn in younger leaves than 'GL'.
- Observation 'WC‐2' tended to accumulate less Fe in younger leaves than 'GL'.
- Observation 'WC‐2' tended to accumulate more Fe in roots than 'GL'.
- Intervention effect Mn inhibited stem exudate production in 'WC‐2'.
- Intervention effect Mn did not inhibit stem exudate production in 'GL'.
- Observation Fe transport per unit root mass was higher in 'GL' than 'WC‐2'.
- Association The authors associate 'GL' Mn tolerance with lower Mn transport, higher Fe transport to young leaves, and internal Mn tolerance.