Paper · 2020 · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)

Automated Corn Ear Height Prediction Using Video-Based Deep Learning

Johnson Wong; Hao Sha; Mohammad Al Hasan; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In corn breeding, hand-measurement of ear height is a labor-intensive process, thus limiting scalability. Here we show that it is feasible to automate estimation of the average ear height of a row of corn in experimental fields used for corn breeding. For this purpose we use point pattern analysis on predicted shank-node locations extracted from video captured on uncalibrated cameras moving through a plot at a fixed height from the ground (4 feet and 2 feet). First, a convolutional neural network-based object detection system (YOLOv3) was trained to detect the ear-stalk connection point and applied to the collected videos. Detected ear position and time information from each frame were super-imposed into a point pattern and point-features were then extracted. Using ridge regression to predict the average ear height per plot, we achieved 0.772 concordance, 2.989 inches root mean squared error, and 2.263 inches mean absolute error compared with hand-measured average ear height. Feature weight importance suggests that one camera may be sufficient for prediction without significant decrease in accuracy. This deep learning system can be utilized by mounting cameras onto the plot combine harvester to collect the necessary videos during harvest and could be expanded to quantify other phenotype measurements of interest that are labor-intensive to collect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The video model predicted average plot ear height with 0.772 concordance against hand measurements.

Outcome
concordancee0
Value
0.772e0
Comparator
hand-measured average ear heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using ridge regression to predict the average ear height per plot, we achieved 0.772 concordance, 2.989 inches root mean squared error, and 2.263 inches mean absolute error compared with hand-measured average ear height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Ear Height Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model had 2.989 inches root mean squared error against hand measured ear height.

Outcome
root mean squared errore0
Value
2.989 inchese0
Comparator
hand-measured average ear heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using ridge regression to predict the average ear height per plot, we achieved 0.772 concordance, 2.989 inches root mean squared error, and 2.263 inches mean absolute error compared with hand-measured average ear height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Ear Height Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model had 2.263 inches mean absolute error against hand measured ear height.

Outcome
mean absolute errore0
Value
2.263 inchese0
Comparator
hand-measured average ear heighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using ridge regression to predict the average ear height per plot, we achieved 0.772 concordance, 2.989 inches root mean squared error, and 2.263 inches mean absolute error compared with hand-measured average ear height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Ear Height Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feature importance suggests one camera may suffice without a significant accuracy decrease.

Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
without significant decreasee0
Comparator
one camerae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Feature weight importance suggests that one camera may be sufficient for prediction without significant decrease in accuracy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Ear Height Prediction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–36 · show in text ↑