Paper · 2021 · Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Some Biocontrol Agents in Controlling the Lesser Date Moth Batrachedra Amydraula. Meyrick), Cosmoptrygidae: Lepidoptera

Khamees Abbood Oleiwi; Hazim Idan Al-Shammari

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was carried out in one of the orchards in Al Saqlawiyah region of Anbar governorate to find out the effect of comercial formulation Bacillus thurengiensis (BT), botanical pesticide Matrixin plus, the aqueous extract of eucalyptus and the interaction between (Matrixin + aqueous extract of eucalyptus) On the percentage of infestation with the insect of Batrachedra amydraula of the Khostawi variety. The results showed that the treatment of B.T bacteria affected the percentage of infection with B.amydraula, reaching 7.67%, while other treatments varied in effect and amounted to (8.42, 9.25, and 9.92%), respectively. While it reached 18% in control treatment. The Matrixin plus treatment outperformed the rest of the treatments in its relative effectiveness, reaching 70.5%, while the other treatments varied with their relative efficacy amounting to (58.5, 56, 55.5)%, respectively, for the treatment (bacteria, mixture and aqueous extract of eucalyptus). As for the productive characteristics (weight kg, weight). 10 kg shamrock, average number of fruits per shamrock. The remainder of the transactions fluctuated by decrease. The comparison treatment was (7.8 kg, 0.5 kg, 12.9 fruits / shamrock), respectively, with a significant difference between the treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B.T treatment yielded 7.67% infection compared with 18% in the control.

Taxon
B.amydraulaBatrachedra amydraulae0
Treatment
B.T bacteriae0
Outcome
percentage of infectione0
Value
7.67%e0
Qualifier
18%e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of B.T bacteria affected the percentage of infection with B.amydraula, reaching 7.67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–534 · show in text ↑
e1

“While it reached 18% in control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matrixin plus achieved relative effectiveness of 70.5%, outperforming the other treatments.

Taxon
Batrachedra amydraulaBatrachedra amydraulae1
Treatment
Matrixin pluse0
Outcome
relative effectivenesse0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
70.5%e0
Comparator
the rest of the treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“The Matrixin plus treatment outperformed the rest of the treatments in its relative effectiveness, reaching 70.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“infestation with the insect of Batrachedra amydraula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria relative efficacy was 58.5%.

Taxon
Batrachedra amydraulaBatrachedra amydraulae1
Treatment
bacteriae0
Outcome
relative efficacye0
Value
58.5e0

Verbatim

e0

“relative efficacy amounting to (58.5, 56, 55.5)%, respectively, for the treatment (bacteria, mixture and aqueous extract of eucalyptus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“infestation with the insect of Batrachedra amydraula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixture relative efficacy was 56%.

Taxon
Batrachedra amydraulaBatrachedra amydraulae1
Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
relative efficacye0
Value
56e0

Verbatim

e0

“relative efficacy amounting to (58.5, 56, 55.5)%, respectively, for the treatment (bacteria, mixture and aqueous extract of eucalyptus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“infestation with the insect of Batrachedra amydraula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus aqueous extract relative efficacy was 55.5%.

Taxon
Batrachedra amydraulaBatrachedra amydraulae1
Treatment
aqueous extract of eucalyptuse0
Outcome
relative efficacye0
Value
55.5e0

Verbatim

e0

“relative efficacy amounting to (58.5, 56, 55.5)%, respectively, for the treatment (bacteria, mixture and aqueous extract of eucalyptus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“infestation with the insect of Batrachedra amydraula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–385 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other treatments had infection percentages of 8.42, 9.25 and 9.92%, with treatment mapping unresolved.

Taxon
B.amydraulaBatrachedra amydraulae0
Outcome
percentage of infectione0
Value
(8.42, 9.25, and 9.92%)e0

Schema note from the model: Treatment mapping is unclear in the abstract.

Verbatim

e0

“percentage of infection with B.amydraula, reaching 7.67%, while other treatments varied in effect and amounted to (8.42, 9.25, and 9.92%), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Productive characteristics decreased in the remaining treatments, with significant treatment differences and control values of 7.8 kg, 0.5 kg and 12.9 fruits per shamrock.

Material
Khostawi varietye1
Treatment
The remainder of the transactionse0
Outcome
productive characteristicse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
(7.8 kg, 0.5 kg, 12.9 fruits / shamrock)e0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Schema note from the model: Damaged productive-trait wording prevents reliable endpoint mapping.

Verbatim

e0

“As for the productive characteristics (weight kg, weight). 10 kg shamrock, average number of fruits per shamrock. The remainder of the transactions fluctuated by decrease. The comparison treatment was (7.8 kg, 0.5 kg, 12.9 fruits / shamrock), respectively, with a significant difference between the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1281 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Khostawi variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–409 · show in text ↑