Paper · 2021 · Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management)

Allometric Equations for Estimating Aboveground Biomass of Eucalyptus urophylla S.T. Blake in East Nusa Tenggara

R Sadono; W Wahyu; F Idris

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Understanding the essential contribution of eucalyptus plantation for industry development and climate change mitigation requires the accurate quantification of aboveground biomass at the individual tree species level. However, the direct measurement of aboveground biomass by destructive method is high cost and time consuming. Therefore, developing allometric equations is necessary to facilitate this effort. This study was designed to construct the specific allometric models for estimating aboveground biomass of Eucalyptus urophylla in East Nusa Tenggara. Forty two sample trees were utilized to develop allometric equations using regression analysis. Several parameters were selected as predictor variables, i.e. diameter at breast height (D), quadrat diameter at breast height combined with tree height (D2H), as well as D and H separately. Results showed that the mean aboveground biomass of E. urophylla was 143.9 ± 19.44 kg tree-1. The highest biomass were noted in stem (80.06%), followed by bark (11.89%), branch (4.69%), and foliage (3.36%). The relative contribution of stem to total aboveground biomass improved with the increasing of diameter class while the opposite trend was recorded in bark, branch, and foliage. The equation lnŶ = lna + b lnD was best and reliable for estimating the aboveground biomass of E. urophylla since it provided the highest accurate estimation (91.3%) and more practical than other models. Referring to these findings, this study concluded the use of allometric equation was reliable to support more efficient forest mensuration in E. urophylla plantation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean aboveground biomass was 143.9 ± 19.44 kg per Eucalyptus tree.

Taxon
E. urophyllaEucalyptus urophyllae0
Outcome
mean aboveground biomasse0
Value
143.9 ± 19.44 kg tree-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus urophylla
Eucalyptus urophylla · TaxonColin Trainor · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean aboveground biomass of E. urophylla was 143.9 ± 19.44 kg tree-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–941 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem contribution to total aboveground biomass rose with diameter class.

Outcome
relative contribution of stem to total aboveground biomasse0
Direction
improvede0
Setting
increasing of diameter classe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The relative contribution of stem to total aboveground biomass improved with the increasing of diameter class”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1165 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bark contribution to biomass fell with diameter class.

Outcome
barke0
Direction
opposite trende0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“the opposite trend was recorded in bark, branch, and foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1232 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch contribution to biomass fell with diameter class.

Outcome
branche0
Direction
opposite trende0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“the opposite trend was recorded in bark, branch, and foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1232 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage contribution to biomass fell with diameter class.

Outcome
foliagee0
Direction
opposite trende0

Not reportedTaxonSetting

Verbatim

e0

“the opposite trend was recorded in bark, branch, and foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1232 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The log diameter equation was the best biomass estimator, with 91.3% accuracy.

Taxon
E. urophyllaEucalyptus urophyllae0
Outcome
estimating the aboveground biomasse0
Value
91.3%e0
Qualifier
lnŶ = lna + b lnDe0
Comparator
other modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus urophylla
Eucalyptus urophylla · TaxonColin Trainor · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The equation lnŶ = lna + b lnD was best and reliable for estimating the aboveground biomass of E. urophylla since it provided the highest accurate estimation (91.3%) and more practical than other models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1436 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that allometric equations can support more efficient forest mensuration.

Taxon
E. urophyllaEucalyptus urophyllae0
Outcome
more efficient forest mensuratione0
Setting
plantatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus urophylla
Eucalyptus urophylla · TaxonColin Trainor · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of allometric equation was reliable to support more efficient forest mensuration in E. urophylla plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1603 · show in text ↑