Claim · model-written summary
Bark contribution to biomass fell with diameter class.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“the opposite trend was recorded in bark, branch, and foliage”
Title
R Sadono; W Wahyu; F Idris Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management) 2021. doi:10.7226/jtfm.27.1.24
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Mean aboveground biomass was 143.9 ± 19.44 kg per Eucalyptus tree.
- Observation Stems accounted for 80.06% of aboveground biomass.
- Observation Bark accounted for 11.89% of aboveground biomass.
- Observation Branches accounted for 4.69% of aboveground biomass.
- Observation Foliage accounted for 3.36% of aboveground biomass.
- Association Stem contribution to total aboveground biomass rose with diameter class.
- Association Branch contribution to biomass fell with diameter class.
- Association Foliage contribution to biomass fell with diameter class.
- Method / resource The log diameter equation was the best biomass estimator, with 91.3% accuracy.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that allometric equations can support more efficient forest mensuration.