Paper · 2016 · 农业科学学报:英文版

Soil properties and corn (Zea mays L.) production under manure application combined with deep tillage management in solonetzic soils of Songnen Plain, Northeast China

Meng; Qingfeng; Li; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Poor soil structure and nutrients,excessive exchangeable Na+,high pH as well as low enzyme activities are common in the solonetz,and significantly restrict corn(Zea mays L.)production.Cattle manure application combined with deep tillage is an important management practice that can affect soil physico-chemical properties and enzyme activities as well as corn yield in the solonetz.Field experiments were carried out in a randomized complete block design comprising four treatments:Corn with conventional tillage was used as a control,and corn with manure application combined with deep tillage as well as film mulching and aluminium sulfate were used as the experimental treatments,respectively.The relationship between corn yield and measured soil properties was determined using stepwise regression analysis.Manure application combined with deep tillage management was more effective than conventional tillage for increasing corn yield and for improving soil properties in the solonetz.The highest corn yield was obtained in the treatments with manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulching(11 472 and 12228 kg ha-1),and increased by 38 and 43%comparing with the control treatment(8343 and8552 kg ha-1)both in the 2013 and 2014 experiments,respectively.Using factor analysis,three factors were obtained,which represented soil fertility status,soil saline-alkaline properties and soil structural properties both in the 2013 and 2014experiments,respectively.Manure and deep tillage management resulted in two distinct groups of soil properties:(1)soils with manure application combined with deep tillage and(2)soils with conventional tillage.Stepwise regression analysis showed that corn yield was significantly and positively correlated to urease and available P,as well as negatively correlated to pH,electrical conductivity(EC),exchange sodium percentage(ESP),and bulk density(pb).We concluded that pb was dominant factor for corn yield on the basis of discriminant coefficient.Manure application combined with d

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plus deep tillage increased corn yield relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
Manure application combined with deep tillage managemente0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Manure application combined with deep tillage management was more effective than conventional tillage for increasing corn yield and for improving soil properties in the solonetz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure plus deep tillage improved solonetz soil properties relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
Manure application combined with deep tillage managemente0
Outcome
soil propertiese0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e0

“Manure application combined with deep tillage management was more effective than conventional tillage for increasing corn yield and for improving soil properties in the solonetz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mulched manure and deep tillage treatment produced 11 472 kg ha-1 corn yield in 2013, 38% above control.

Treatment
manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulchinge1
Outcome
corn yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11 472e1
Qualifier
2013e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest corn yield was obtained in the treatments with manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulching(11 472 and 12228 kg ha-1),and increased by 38 and 43%comparing with the control treatment(8343 and8552 kg ha-1)both in the 2013 and 2014 experiments,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mulched manure and deep tillage treatment produced 12228 kg ha-1 corn yield in 2014, 43% above control.

Treatment
manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulchinge1
Outcome
corn yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
12228 kg ha-1e1
Qualifier
2014e1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest corn yield was obtained in the treatments with manure application+deep tillage+plastic film mulching(11 472 and 12228 kg ha-1),and increased by 38 and 43%comparing with the control treatment(8343 and8552 kg ha-1)both in the 2013 and 2014 experiments,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1264 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Factor analysis identified three soil-property factors in both years.

Outcome
three factorse2
Value
three factorse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“Using factor analysis,three factors were obtained,which represented soil fertility status,soil saline-alkaline properties and soil structural properties both in the 2013 and 2014experiments,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1467 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure and deep tillage separated soils into two property groups.

Treatment
Manure and deep tillage managemente3
Outcome
two distinct groups of soil propertiese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e3

“Manure and deep tillage management resulted in two distinct groups of soil properties:(1)soils with manure application combined with deep tillage and(2)soils with conventional tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1651 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield correlated positively with urease and available P.

Compound
available Pe4
Outcome
corn yielde4
Direction
positively correlatede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e4

“Stepwise regression analysis showed that corn yield was significantly and positively correlated to urease and available P,as well as negatively correlated to pH,electrical conductivity(EC),exchange sodium percentage(ESP),and bulk density(pb).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1893 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield correlated negatively with pH, electrical conductivity, exchange sodium percentage, and bulk density.

Outcome
corn yielde4
Direction
negatively correlatede4
Qualifier
pH,electrical conductivity(EC),exchange sodium percentage(ESP),and bulk density(pb)e4
Setting
solonetze0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e4

“Stepwise regression analysis showed that corn yield was significantly and positively correlated to urease and available P,as well as negatively correlated to pH,electrical conductivity(EC),exchange sodium percentage(ESP),and bulk density(pb).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1893 · show in text ↑
e0

“Manure application combined with deep tillage management was more effective than conventional tillage for increasing corn yield and for improving soil properties in the solonetz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–989 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulk density was interpreted as the dominant factor for corn yield.

Outcome
corn yielde5
Setting
pbe5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–38 · show in text ↑
e5

“We concluded that pb was dominant factor for corn yield on the basis of discriminant coefficient.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–1990 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Without nitrogen in the wet year, mulched plots yielded much less.

    Effect of a Killed Sod Mulch on Nitrate Movement and Corn Yield1 · 1973 · compared with conventionally‐tilled no nitrogen treatment

    Opposite direction

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.