Paper · 2014 · Nanfang nongye xuebao

Establishment of sugarcane genetic transformation system by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated cold regulated gene(Cbcor15a)

Teng Zhen

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】A cold-regulated gene Cbcor15 a isolated from Chorispora bungeana was transferred into sugarcane embryogenic callus by Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated method to establish high-efficient genetic transformation system in order to provide basis on breeding sugarcane varieties with cold resistance. 【Method】Sugarcane variety ROC22 was used as tested material to optimize culture media for callus induction, bud differentiation and plantlet rooting, and screen suitable type and dosage of hormone, PPT and antibiotics dosage, which adapted for exogenous gene transferring to sugarcane. By using a bivalent plant expression vector named pCambia1300- Cbcor15a-bar,Cbcor15 a gene was transferred into callus of sugarcane using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated method. 【Result】The results showed that OD6000.4 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and 20 min of infecting time were beneficial to callus differentiation. The optimal dosage of PPT for callus induction and differentiation was 0.50 mg/L. After infected,adding 500.00 mg/L antibiotic Cef in co-culture could effectively inhabit growth of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, while adding 300.00 mg/L Cef could promote callus differentiation, and 200.00 mg/L Cef could promote plantlet rooting.Low dosage of NAA in MS medium was more beneficial to callus differentiation, and KT was superior to 6-BA in promoting cell division. By adding 5.00 mg/L NAA and 70.00 g/L sugar in MS medium could effectively promote plantlets rooting. After the preliminary selection using PPT, 286 anti- PPT regenerated plantlets transferred with Cbcor15 a gene were obtained. Eighty-three plantlets with well growing were selected to detect by PCR, out of which four anti-PPT regenerated plantlets were positive. 【Conclusion】The Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation system was established successfully for exogenous gene transferring to sugarcane, and Cbcor15 a gene had been integrated into genome of sugarcane.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agrobacterium OD6000.4 and 20 minutes of infection benefited sugarcane callus differentiation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
OD6000.4 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and 20 min of infecting timee0
Interactor
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0other
Outcome
callus differentiatione0
Direction
beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“OD6000.4 of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and 20 min of infecting time were beneficial to callus differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–917 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal PPT dose for sugarcane callus induction and differentiation was 0.50 mg/L.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
optimal dosage of PPT for callus induction and differentiatione0
Value
0.50 mg/Le0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“The optimal dosage of PPT for callus induction and differentiation was 0.50 mg/L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cef at 500.00 mg/L inhibited Agrobacterium growth in sugarcane co-culture.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
500.00 mg/L antibiotic Cefe0
Interactor
Agrobacterium tumefaciensAgrobacterium tumefaciense0other
Outcome
growth of Agrobacterium tumefaciense0
Direction
inhabite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“adding 500.00 mg/L antibiotic Cef in co-culture could effectively inhabit growth of Agrobacterium tumefaciens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cef at 300.00 mg/L promoted sugarcane callus differentiation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
300.00 mg/L Cefe0
Outcome
callus differentiatione0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“adding 300.00 mg/L Cef could promote callus differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cef at 200.00 mg/L promoted sugarcane plantlet rooting.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
200.00 mg/L Cefe0
Outcome
plantlet rootinge0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“200.00 mg/L Cef could promote plantlet rooting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low dose NAA in MS medium benefited sugarcane callus differentiation.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Low dosage of NAA in MS mediume0
Outcome
callus differentiatione0
Direction
more beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low dosage of NAA in MS medium was more beneficial to callus differentiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KT was superior to 6-BA for promoting sugarcane cell division.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
KTe0
Outcome
cell divisione0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
6-BAe0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“KT was superior to 6-BA in promoting cell division”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 5.00 mg/L NAA and 70.00 g/L sugar to MS medium promoted sugarcane plantlet rooting.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
5.00 mg/L NAA and 70.00 g/L sugar in MS mediume0
Outcome
plantlets rootinge0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“By adding 5.00 mg/L NAA and 70.00 g/L sugar in MS medium could effectively promote plantlets rooting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1480 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPT selection yielded 286 anti-PPT regenerated sugarcane plantlets transferred with Cbcor15 a.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Gene
Cbcor15 a genee0
Outcome
anti- PPT regenerated plantlets transferred with Cbcor15 a genee0
Value
286e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“After the preliminary selection using PPT, 286 anti- PPT regenerated plantlets transferred with Cbcor15 a gene were obtained.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1606 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four of 83 selected sugarcane plantlets tested positive by PCR.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
anti-PPT regenerated plantlets were positivee0
Value
foure0
Qualifier
Eighty-three plantlets with well growinge0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Eighty-three plantlets with well growing were selected to detect by PCR, out of which four anti-PPT regenerated plantlets were positive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1607–1743 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that Cbcor15 a was integrated into the sugarcane genome.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Gene
Cbcor15 a genee0
Outcome
integrated into genome of sugarcanee0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cbcor15 a gene had been integrated into genome of sugarcane.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–1964 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors reported successful establishment of an Agrobacterium mediated sugarcane transformation system.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
genetic transformation system was established successfullye0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26 · show in text ↑
e0

“The Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation system was established successfully for exogenous gene transferring to sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1898 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

infection · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

in vitro · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 59 positive, 8 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.