Paper · 2021 · OALib

Simulation of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) Attacks and the Compensative Response of Quality Protein Maize (Zea mays, var. Mudishi-1 and Mudishi-3) in Southwestern DR Congo

Jean Pierre Kabongo Tshiabukole; Gertrude Pongi Khonde; André Matondo Phongo; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In this paper, to assess the varietal ability to compensate defoliation damage caused by the fall armyworm, a trial was carried out at the INERA Mvuazi research center. The aim of this study was to determine the limit threshold of damage that could cause the significant loss of the harvest of the quality protein maize distributed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. To do this, three factors including two varieties (Mudishi-1 and Mudishi-3) of quality protein maize, four rating damage and two growth stages were used into a factorial design with 3 replications. Simulation of damage caused by FAW consisted of cutting of blades for all visible leaves of plants. Damage rates simulating leaf destroying were 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%, occurring at two growth stages: stage V3 (2 to 4 weeks after emergence) and stage V7 (flowering stage). Results showed that damage factor combined with growth stage factor significantly influenced (p < 0.05) the yield component variables including yield losses, harvest rate, ear sizes, number of ears harvested and yield as well as the market quality of the ears, based on appearance quotation. Damage rate more than 50%, at all growth stages studied, caused grain losses upper than 50% regardless of variety. However, damage less than 50% at V3 stage resulted in grain losses under 10%. At the end of this study, we showed that the varieties of maize QPM (Mudishi-1 and Mudishi-3) would be able to compensate the damage caused by the FAW and achieve its yield, if the attacks damaging 25% of the leaves occur during V3.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation damage and growth stage jointly affected yield loss, harvest rate, ear traits, yield and market quality.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
damage factor combined with growth stage factore0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
yield losses, harvest rate, ear sizese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“damage factor combined with growth stage factor significantly influenced (p < 0.05) the yield component variables including yield losses, harvest rate, ear sizes, number of ears harvested and yield as well as the market quality of the ears, based on appearance quotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda) Attacks and the Compensative Response of Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation above 50% caused grain losses above 50% at both growth stages regardless of variety.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Damage rate more than 50%e0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
grain lossese0
Direction
upper thane0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage rate more than 50%, at all growth stages studied, caused grain losses upper than 50% regardless of variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda) Attacks and the Compensative Response of Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation below 50% at V3 produced grain losses below 10%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
damage less than 50% at V3 stagee0
Interactor
Spodoptera frugiperdaSpodoptera frugiperdat0pest
Outcome
grain lossese0
Direction
undere0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera frugiperda
Spodoptera frugiperda · InteractorUSGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab from Beltsville, Maryland, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“damage less than 50% at V3 stage resulted in grain losses under 10%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spodoptera frugiperda) Attacks and the Compensative Response of Quality Protein Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mudishi-1 and Mudishi-3 could compensate 25% leaf damage at V3 and attain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Mudishi-1 and Mudishi-3e0
Treatment
attacks damaging 25% of the leavese0
Interactor
FAWe0pest
Outcome
compensate the damagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the varieties of maize QPM (Mudishi-1 and Mudishi-3) would be able to compensate the damage caused by the FAW and achieve its yield, if the attacks damaging 25% of the leaves occur during V3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1565 · show in text ↑

stage · Spodoptera frugiperda · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.