Paper · 2021 · Phyton

Laboratory-and Field-Phenotyping for Drought Stress Tolerance and Diversity Study in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)

Shahida Akter; Israt Jahan; Md. Amir Hossain; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought susceptibility and low genetic variability are the major constraints of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) production worldwide. Development of an efficient pre-field drought phenotyping technique and identification of diversified drought tolerant lentil genotype(s) are therefore vital and necessary. Two separate experiments were conducted using thirty diverse lentil genotypes to isolate drought tolerant genotype(s) as well as to assess their diversity. In both of the experiments, significant (p ≤ 0.01) variation in genotype (G), treatment (T) and G X T was observed for most of the studied traits. In experiment I, genotypes were examined for drought tolerance at the seedlings stage under hydroponic conditions by assessing root and shoot traits. Among the 30 genotypes studied, BM-1247, BM-1227 and BM-502 were selected as highly tolerant to drought stress as they showed maximum seedling survivability and minimum reduction in growth parameters under drought stress. In experiment II, the genotypes were assayed for diversity and drought stress tolerance based on morphological traits grown under field condition. Drought stress caused a substantial reduction in yield attributing traits, however, the genotypes BM-1247, BM-981, BM-1227 and BM-502 were categorized as drought tolerant genotypes with less than 20% yield reduction. The field screening result of drought stress tolerance was coincided well with the results of laboratory screening. Genetic divergence study reflected the presence of considerable diversity among the genotypes. Considering laboratory and field screening results, the genotypes, BM-1247, BM-1227, BM-981 and BM- 502 were selected as the best drought tolerant genotypes. This information can be exploited for further breeding in developing drought tolerance in lentil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype, treatment and their interaction varied significantly for most measured traits.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
genotype (G)e0
Outcome
most of the studied traitse0
Value
p ≤ 0.01e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant (p ≤ 0.01) variation in genotype (G), treatment (T) and G X T was observed for most of the studied traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-1247 showed high drought tolerance with maximum seedling survival and minimum growth reduction.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
BM-1247e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
maximum seedling survivability and minimum reduction in growth parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BM-1247, BM-1227 and BM-502 were selected as highly tolerant to drought stress as they showed maximum seedling survivability and minimum reduction in growth parameters under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-1227 showed high drought tolerance with maximum seedling survival and minimum growth reduction.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
BM-1227e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
maximum seedling survivability and minimum reduction in growth parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BM-1247, BM-1227 and BM-502 were selected as highly tolerant to drought stress as they showed maximum seedling survivability and minimum reduction in growth parameters under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-502 showed high drought tolerance with maximum seedling survival and minimum growth reduction.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
BM-502e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
maximum seedling survivability and minimum reduction in growth parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BM-1247, BM-1227 and BM-502 were selected as highly tolerant to drought stress as they showed maximum seedling survivability and minimum reduction in growth parameters under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought substantially reduced lentil yield traits.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
yield attributing traitse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress caused a substantial reduction in yield attributing traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-1247 had less than 20% yield reduction under drought in the field.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
BM-1247e0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
less than 20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BM-1247, BM-981, BM-1227 and BM-502 were categorized as drought tolerant genotypes with less than 20% yield reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-981 had less than 20% yield reduction under drought in the field.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
BM-981e0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
less than 20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BM-1247, BM-981, BM-1227 and BM-502 were categorized as drought tolerant genotypes with less than 20% yield reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-1227 had less than 20% yield reduction under drought in the field.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
BM-1227e0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
less than 20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BM-1247, BM-981, BM-1227 and BM-502 were categorized as drought tolerant genotypes with less than 20% yield reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BM-502 had less than 20% yield reduction under drought in the field.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
BM-502e0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
less than 20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BM-1247, BM-981, BM-1227 and BM-502 were categorized as drought tolerant genotypes with less than 20% yield reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field drought screening agreed well with laboratory screening.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
field screening result of drought stress tolerancee0
Comparator
results of laboratory screeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The field screening result of drought stress tolerance was coincided well with the results of laboratory screening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes showed considerable genetic diversity.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
considerable diversity among the genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genetic divergence study reflected the presence of considerable diversity among the genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

BM-1247, BM-1227, BM-981 and BM-502 were selected as the best drought tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
BM-1247e0
Outcome
best drought tolerant genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotypes, BM-1247, BM-1227, BM-981 and BM- 502 were selected as the best drought tolerant genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–115 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
    Lentil experienced lower drought-induced yield reduction than cowpea and green gram.

    Global Synthesis of Drought Effects on Food Legume Production · 2015 · compared with legumes such as cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and green gram (Vigna radiate)

    Opposite direction

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.