Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The efficiency of application of biological preparations with a fungicidal effect against the sunflower diseases in the central zone of the Krasnodar region

A S Bushnev; S B Babenko; N A Bushneva

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Diseases are one of the main factors limiting the reception of high sunflower yields. The use of biological preparations for plant protection will allow to fight diseases successfully and improve the products quality. The article presents the results of research on the efficiency of application of biopreparations under the trademarks of BSka-3 with active ingredient Trichoderma viride, Pseudomonas koreensis, Bacillus subtilis and BFTIM with active ingredient Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against sunflower diseases. We conducted the experiments in 2018-2019 on the fields of the “Berezanskoye” farm in Korenovsky district of the Krasnodar region. We established that biofungicides effectively suppressed seed infection. In 2018-2019, dry rot of heads ( Rhizopus spp.), bacterioses ( Xanthomonas spp., Pseudomonas spp.) and Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae Kleb.) had the highest prevalence in the sunflower sowing: 49.75 %, 42.0 % and 47.0 %, respectively. The schemes of BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM K and BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM B showed the best biological efficacy against Rhizopus spp.: 37 and 38 %, respectively. The schemes of BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM K and BSka-3 G + BFTIM Zh + BFTIM Z were the most effective against the bacterioses: 54 and 51 %, respectively; the standard and variant of BSka-3 B + BFTIM V + BFTIM G showed 32 and 31 % of efficiency, respectively, against Verticillium wilt. The schemes of BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM B (2.65 t/ha) and BSka-3 + BFTMI I + BFTMI K (2.61 t/ha) showed the best economic effectiveness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofungicides suppressed seed infection.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
biofungicidese0
Outcome
seed infectione0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biofungicides effectively suppressed seed infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower dry rot of heads prevalence was 49.75 %.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Interactor
Rhizopus spp.Rhizopuse0pathogen
Outcome
dry rot of headse0
Value
49.75 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus
Rhizopus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRamy algayar · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry rot of heads ( Rhizopus spp.), bacterioses ( Xanthomonas spp., Pseudomonas spp.) and Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae Kleb.) had the highest prevalence in the sunflower sowing: 49.75 %, 42.0 % and 47.0 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower bacterioses prevalence was 42.0 %.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Interactor
Xanthomonas spp.Xanthomonase0pathogen
Outcome
bacteriosese0
Value
42.0 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Xanthomonas
Xanthomonas · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry rot of heads ( Rhizopus spp.), bacterioses ( Xanthomonas spp., Pseudomonas spp.) and Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae Kleb.) had the highest prevalence in the sunflower sowing: 49.75 %, 42.0 % and 47.0 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower Verticillium wilt prevalence was 47.0 %.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Interactor
Verticillium dahliae Kleb.Verticillium dahliaee0pathogen
Outcome
Verticillium wilte0
Value
47.0 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Verticillium dahliae
Verticillium dahliae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry rot of heads ( Rhizopus spp.), bacterioses ( Xanthomonas spp., Pseudomonas spp.) and Verticillium wilt (Verticillium dahliae Kleb.) had the highest prevalence in the sunflower sowing: 49.75 %, 42.0 % and 47.0 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM K had 37 % biological efficacy against Rhizopus spp.

Treatment
BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM Ke0
Interactor
Rhizopus spp.Rhizopuse0pathogen
Outcome
biological efficacy against Rhizopus spp.e0
Direction
beste0
Value
37e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizopus
Rhizopus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRamy algayar · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The schemes of BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM K and BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM B showed the best biological efficacy against Rhizopus spp.: 37 and 38 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM B had 38 % biological efficacy against Rhizopus spp.

Treatment
BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM Be0
Interactor
Rhizopus spp.Rhizopuse0pathogen
Outcome
biological efficacy against Rhizopus spp.e0
Direction
beste0
Value
38 %e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizopus
Rhizopus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRamy algayar · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The schemes of BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM K and BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM B showed the best biological efficacy against Rhizopus spp.: 37 and 38 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM K had 54 efficacy against bacterioses.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM Ke0
Outcome
bacteriosese0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
54e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The schemes of BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM K and BSka-3 G + BFTIM Zh + BFTIM Z were the most effective against the bacterioses: 54 and 51 %, respectively;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSka-3 G + BFTIM Zh + BFTIM Z had 51 % efficacy against bacterioses.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
BSka-3 G + BFTIM Zh + BFTIM Ze0
Outcome
bacteriosese0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
51 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The schemes of BSka-3 D + BFTIM I + BFTIM K and BSka-3 G + BFTIM Zh + BFTIM Z were the most effective against the bacterioses: 54 and 51 %, respectively;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

standard had 32 efficacy against Verticillium wilt.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
standarde0
Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliume0pathogen
Outcome
Verticillium wilte0
Value
32e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the standard and variant of BSka-3 B + BFTIM V + BFTIM G showed 32 and 31 % of efficiency, respectively, against Verticillium wilt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSka-3 B + BFTIM V + BFTIM G had 31 % efficacy against Verticillium wilt.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
BSka-3 B + BFTIM V + BFTIM Ge0
Interactor
VerticilliumVerticilliume0pathogen
Outcome
Verticillium wilte0
Value
31 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the standard and variant of BSka-3 B + BFTIM V + BFTIM G showed 32 and 31 % of efficiency, respectively, against Verticillium wilt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM B yielded 2.65 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM Be0
Outcome
economic effectivenesse0
Direction
beste0
Value
2.65 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The schemes of BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM B (2.65 t/ha) and BSka-3 + BFTMI I + BFTMI K (2.61 t/ha) showed the best economic effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSka-3 + BFTMI I + BFTMI K yielded 2.61 t/ha.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
BSka-3 + BFTMI I + BFTMI Ke0
Outcome
economic effectivenesse0
Direction
beste0
Value
2.61 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The schemes of BSka-3 A + BFTIM B + BFTIM B (2.65 t/ha) and BSka-3 + BFTMI I + BFTMI K (2.61 t/ha) showed the best economic effectiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–112 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · disease · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.