Paper · 2016 · 农业科学学报:英文版

A genetic evidence of chromosomal fragment from bridge parent existing in substitution lines between two common wheat varieties

Zhao; Pei Pei; Wang; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Locating of important agronomic genes onto chromosome is helpful for efficient development of new wheat varieties. Wheat chromosome substitution lines between two varieties have been widely used for locating genes because of their distinctive advantages in genetic analysis, compared with the aneuploid genetic materials. Apart from the substituted chromosome, the other chromosomes between the substitution lines and their recipient parent should be identical, which eases the gene locating practice. In this study, a set of chromosome substitution lines with cv. Wichita(WI) as the recipient parent and cv. Cheyenne(CNN) as the donor parent were studied for the composition of high molecular weight glutenin subunits(HMW-GS) as well as a range of agronomic important traits. Results revealed that the substitution lines of WI(CNN5D), WI(CNN6A) and WI(CNN7B) had higher plant heights than the two parents of WI and CNN, and WI(CNN3D) had later maturity than the parents. By sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis(SDS-PAGE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry(MALDI-TOF-MS) analysis, a substitution line WI(CNN5B) was found to contain different HMW-GS patterns from its two parents, in which 1By9 was replaced by 1By8 on chromosome 1BL. Simple sequence repeat(SSR) analysis confirmed that the variation on 1BL in WI(CNN5B) was originated from Chinese Spring(CS). It is concluded that chromosomal fragments from bridge material and donor parent were quite often retained in intracultivaral chromosome substitution lines except the substituting chromosomes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WI(CNN5D) was taller than both parents.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WI(CNN5D)e0
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the two parents of WI and CNNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WI(CNN5D), WI(CNN6A) and WI(CNN7B) had higher plant heights than the two parents of WI and CNN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WI(CNN6A) was taller than both parents.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WI(CNN6A)e0
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the two parents of WI and CNNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WI(CNN5D), WI(CNN6A) and WI(CNN7B) had higher plant heights than the two parents of WI and CNN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WI(CNN7B) was taller than both parents.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WI(CNN7B)e0
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the two parents of WI and CNNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WI(CNN5D), WI(CNN6A) and WI(CNN7B) had higher plant heights than the two parents of WI and CNN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WI(CNN3D) matured later than its parents.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WI(CNN3D)e0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
latere0
Comparator
the parentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WI(CNN3D) had later maturity than the parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WI(CNN5B) had a distinct HMW-GS pattern: 1By9 was replaced by 1By8 on chromosome 1BL.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WI(CNN5B)e0
Gene
1By8e0
Outcome
different HMW-GS patternse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WI(CNN5B) was found to contain different HMW-GS patterns from its two parents, in which 1By9 was replaced by 1By8 on chromosome 1BL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1BL variation in WI(CNN5B) originated from Chinese Spring.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WI(CNN5B)e0
Gene
1BLe0
Outcome
was originated from Chinese Spring(CS)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variation on 1BL in WI(CNN5B) was originated from Chinese Spring(CS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chromosomal fragments from bridge material and donor parent often persisted outside substituted chromosomes.

Taxon
common wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
chromosomal fragments from bridge material and donor parent were quite often retainede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chromosomal fragments from bridge material and donor parent were quite often retained in intracultivaral chromosome substitution lines except the substituting chromosomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“common wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–117 · show in text ↑