Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Sowing Date and Genotype Influence on Yield and Quality of Dual-Purpose Barley in a Salt-Affected Arid Region

Ehab S. A. Moustafa; El-Sayed E. A. El-Sobky; Hossam I. A. Farag; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
43
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dual-purpose barley is an alternative approach to producing high-quality forage yield plus an acceptable grain yield in marginal environments of arid regions that are characterized by lack of forage. Field experiment was performed in two consecutive growing seasons at an arid region affected by salinity in irrigation water and soil at Western Sinai Peninsula in Egypt. The study aimed to optimize sowing date and screen salt-tolerant barley genotypes that perform better in terms of forage yield and quality as well as grain and biomass yield production in salt-affected environment. Sowing dates, genotypes, and their interaction significantly impacted most of the studied variables such as forage yield, crude protein yield, and grain and biomass yields. The early sowing in late October yielded higher than intermediate sowing in mid-November and late sowing in early December. Some of the tested genotypes performed better than others as indicated by about 50% higher forage yield, 6% crude protein content, 39% grain and 21% biological yields (total aboveground dry matter), suggesting higher adaptation capacity. Interestingly, grain and biological yields did not differ significantly between dual-purpose approach and grain-only pattern. In conclusion, dual-purpose barley was found favorable for producing grain and forage production in similar environments under early sowing date.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date, genotype and their interaction significantly affected most yield and quality variables of dual-purpose barley

Treatment
Sowing datese1
Outcome
most of the studied variablese1
Direction
impactede1
Setting
Western Sinai Peninsula in Egypte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dual-Purpose Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sowing dates, genotypes, and their interaction significantly impacted most of the studied variables such as forage yield, crude protein yield, and grain and biomass yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–757 · show in text ↑
e3

“Field experiment was performed in two consecutive growing seasons at an arid region affected by salinity in irrigation water and soil at Western Sinai Peninsula in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in late October yielded more than intermediate sowing in mid-November

Treatment
early sowing in late Octobere2
Outcome
yieldede2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
intermediate sowing in mid-Novembere2
Setting
Western Sinai Peninsula in Egypte3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dual-Purpose Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“The early sowing in late October yielded higher than intermediate sowing in mid-November and late sowing in early December”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–881 · show in text ↑
e3

“Field experiment was performed in two consecutive growing seasons at an arid region affected by salinity in irrigation water and soil at Western Sinai Peninsula in Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–369 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some tested barley genotypes had about 50% higher forage yield than others

Material
Some of the tested genotypese4
Outcome
forage yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
50%e4
Comparator
otherse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dual-Purpose Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“Some of the tested genotypes performed better than others as indicated by about 50% higher forage yield, 6% crude protein content, 39% grain and 21% biological yields (total aboveground dry matter), suggesting higher adaptation capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some tested barley genotypes had 6% higher crude protein content than others

Material
Some of the tested genotypese4
Outcome
crude protein contente4
Direction
highere4
Value
6%e4
Comparator
otherse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dual-Purpose Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“Some of the tested genotypes performed better than others as indicated by about 50% higher forage yield, 6% crude protein content, 39% grain and 21% biological yields (total aboveground dry matter), suggesting higher adaptation capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some tested barley genotypes had 39% higher grain yield than others

Material
Some of the tested genotypese4
Outcome
graine4
Direction
highere4
Value
39%e4
Comparator
otherse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dual-Purpose Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“Some of the tested genotypes performed better than others as indicated by about 50% higher forage yield, 6% crude protein content, 39% grain and 21% biological yields (total aboveground dry matter), suggesting higher adaptation capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some tested barley genotypes had 21% higher biological yield than others

Material
Some of the tested genotypese4
Outcome
biological yieldse4
Direction
highere4
Value
21%e4
Comparator
otherse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dual-Purpose Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“Some of the tested genotypes performed better than others as indicated by about 50% higher forage yield, 6% crude protein content, 39% grain and 21% biological yields (total aboveground dry matter), suggesting higher adaptation capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and biological yields did not differ significantly between dual-purpose and grain-only barley

Treatment
dual-purpose approache5
Outcome
grain and biological yieldse5
Direction
did not differ significantlye5
Comparator
grain-only patterne5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dual-Purpose Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–78 · show in text ↑
e5

“grain and biological yields did not differ significantly between dual-purpose approach and grain-only pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1245 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Dual-purpose barley is favorable for grain and forage production under early sowing in similar environments

Outcome
favorable for producing grain and forage productione6
Setting
similar environmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Dual-Purpose Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–78 · show in text ↑
e6

“dual-purpose barley was found favorable for producing grain and forage production in similar environments under early sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1391 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 39 positive, 31 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.