Paper · 2015 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Essential Micronutrient Biofortification Of Sprouts Grown On Mineral Fortified Fiber Mats

Nyenhuis, Jacquelyn; Jaroslaw W. Drelich

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Diets high in processed foods have been found to lack essential micro-nutrients for optimum human development and overall health. Some micro-nutrients such as copper (Cu) have been found to enhance the inflammatory response through its oxidative functions, thereby having a role in cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetes and related complications. This research study was designed to determine if food crops could be bio-fortified with micro-nutrients by growing sprouts on mineral fortified fiber mats. In the feasibility study described in this contribution, recycled cellulose fibers and clay, saturated with either micro-nutrient copper ions or copper nanoparticles, were converted to a novel mineral-cellulose fiber carrier of essential micro-nutrient and of antimicrobial properties. Seeds of Medicago sativa (alfalfa), purchased from a commercial, organic supplier were germinated on engineered cellulose fiber mats. After the appearance of the first leaves, the sprouts were dehydrated and analyzed for Cu content. Nutrient analysis showed ~2 increase in Cu of the sprouts grown on the fiber mats with copper particles, and ~4 increase on mats with ionic copper as compared to the control samples. This study illustrates the potential for the use of engineered mats as a viable way to increase the micro-nutrient composition of locally-grown food crops and the need for additional research to determine the uptake, nutritional implications and risks of micro-nutrient bio-fortification.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa sprouts grown on fiber mats with copper particles had about 2 times higher Cu content than control samples.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
fiber mats with copper particlese1
Outcome
Cu of the sproutse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
~2e1
Comparator
control samplese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds of Medicago sativa (alfalfa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nutrient analysis showed ~2 increase in Cu of the sprouts grown on the fiber mats with copper particles, and ~4 increase on mats with ionic copper as compared to the control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa sprouts grown on fiber mats with ionic copper had about 4 times higher Cu content than control samples.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
mats with ionic coppere1
Outcome
Cu of the sproutse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
~4e1
Comparator
control samplese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds of Medicago sativa (alfalfa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nutrient analysis showed ~2 increase in Cu of the sprouts grown on the fiber mats with copper particles, and ~4 increase on mats with ionic copper as compared to the control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1218 · show in text ↑

copper atom · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.