Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of interaction between pheromone traps and plant seeds of harmal, Peganum harmala, on lesser date moth, Batrachedra amydraula (Merck), in Basra Province

Ali Dhareb Shaaban; Mohammed Hussein Minati; Abbas Dareb Shaban; et al.

10
claims
33
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The lesser date moth, Batrachedra amydraula Merck is one of the most important pests affect date palm fruits, which cause great losses to the yield, whether in quantity or quality. This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district to study the effect of harmal plant seeds on the numerical density, percentage and severity of infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees. The results showed that the highest number of lesser date moths’ population density was appeared in the fogging treatment (111.3 / trap), while the lowest was in the fumigation treatment (64.3 / trap). The lowest percentage of infection by lesser date moth was in the aqueous extract treatment of (29.7%), while the highest was in the fumigation treatment (31.4%). In the first period, the treatment of aqueous extract gave the best results, as the percentage of infection was (17.8%). The lowest rate of infection severity was also in the treatment of aqueous extract (2.2 / 5 fruit), while the highest was in the fogging treatment (6.5 / 5 fruit). In the third period, both treatments of fumigation and fogging gave the best results, as the infection severity was (0/5 fruit) compared to the control for the same period of (8.9 / 5 fruit). The treatment of aqueous extract gave the best results in reducing the severity of infection by lesser date moth, while the treatment of fogging gave the best results in reducing the number density of lesser date moth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fogging treatment gave the highest lesser date moth population density (111.3 per trap).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
fogging treatmente2
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
population densitye2
Direction
higheste2
Value
111.3 / trape2
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the highest number of lesser date moths’ population density was appeared in the fogging treatment (111.3 / trap)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–545 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation treatment gave the lowest lesser date moth population density (64.3 per trap).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
fumigation treatmente3
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
population densitye2
Direction
loweste3
Value
64.3 / trape3
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the highest number of lesser date moths’ population density was appeared in the fogging treatment (111.3 / trap)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–545 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the lowest was in the fumigation treatment (64.3 / trap)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous extract treatment gave the lowest percentage of lesser date moth infection (29.7%).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
aqueous extract treatmente2
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
percentage of infectione2
Direction
loweste2
Value
29.7%e2
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The lowest percentage of infection by lesser date moth was in the aqueous extract treatment of (29.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation treatment gave the highest percentage of lesser date moth infection (31.4%).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
fumigation treatmente3
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
percentage of infectione2
Direction
higheste3
Value
31.4%e3
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The lowest percentage of infection by lesser date moth was in the aqueous extract treatment of (29.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–713 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the highest was in the fumigation treatment (31.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first period, aqueous extract treatment gave a lower percentage of lesser date moth infection (17.8%).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
aqueous extracte2
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
percentage of infectione2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
17.8%e2
Qualifier
first periode2
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In the first period, the treatment of aqueous extract gave the best results, as the percentage of infection was (17.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–893 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous extract treatment gave the lowest rate of lesser date moth infection severity (2.2 per 5 fruit).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
aqueous extracte2
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
rate of infection severitye2
Direction
loweste2
Value
2.2 / 5 fruite2
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The lowest rate of infection severity was also in the treatment of aqueous extract (2.2 / 5 fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fogging treatment gave the highest rate of lesser date moth infection severity (6.5 per 5 fruit).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
fogging treatmente3
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
rate of infection severitye2
Direction
higheste3
Value
6.5 / 5 fruite3
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The lowest rate of infection severity was also in the treatment of aqueous extract (2.2 / 5 fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–993 · show in text ↑
e3

“while the highest was in the fogging treatment (6.5 / 5 fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1057 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third period, fumigation treatment gave lower lesser date moth infection severity (0/5 fruit) than the control (8.9 / 5 fruit).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
fumigatione2
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
infection severitye2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
0/5 fruite2
Qualifier
third periode2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In the third period, both treatments of fumigation and fogging gave the best results, as the infection severity was (0/5 fruit) compared to the control for the same period of (8.9 / 5 fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third period, fogging treatment gave lower lesser date moth infection severity (0/5 fruit) than the control (8.9 / 5 fruit).

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
fogginge2
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
infection severitye2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
0/5 fruite2
Qualifier
third periode2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“In the third period, both treatments of fumigation and fogging gave the best results, as the infection severity was (0/5 fruit) compared to the control for the same period of (8.9 / 5 fruit)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fogging treatment gave the best results in reducing lesser date moth number density.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferae1
Treatment
fogginge2
Interactor
lesser date mothe1pest
Outcome
number density of lesser date mothe2
Direction
reducinge2
Setting
Basra province / Al-Qurna districte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“while the treatment of fogging gave the best results in reducing the number density of lesser date moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1468 · show in text ↑
e1

“infection caused by lesser date moth on the date palm trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–407 · show in text ↑
e0

“This study was conducted in Basra province / Al-Qurna district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–252 · show in text ↑

solarization · pest · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · disease · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.