Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The Effect of Bacterial R. liguminosarum and Fungal T. harzinum Inoculation and Organic Manure on Root Nodes, Growth, and Yield of Mung Bean, Vigna radiate

Huda Rasim Jawad Al-Shabani; Jawad Abdel-Kadhim Kamal

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the effect of the bacterial inoculum R. liguminosarum, T. harzinum , levels of organic fertilizer (0, 5, and 10) t ha −1 , and their overlap the root nodes (number of root nodes and weight of root nodes) and the growth and yield of a local variety of mung bean ( Dry weight of root mass, leaf chlorophyll content and grain yield). A field experiment was conducted in the fall season of 2020 in one of the fields of Al-Diwaniyah Governorate / Al-Daghara county. The experiment was carried out according to the Randomized Complete Block Design (R. C. B. D) with three replications. The results of the statistical analysis of the least significant difference (L. S. D.) present that the overlapping treatment (bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizer) resulted in the highest means: number of root nodes, root nodule weight, dry weight of root total, chlorophyll content in leaves and grain yield, (72.33) Knots.plants −1 , (463) gm Plants −1 , (1, 547) gm Plants −1 , (59.14) SPAD, and (3, 531) t ha −1 , respectively, by comparison with comparison treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inocula and five t ha −1 organic fertilizer gave the highest root node number, 72.33 Knots.plants −1.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizere0
Outcome
number of root nodese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
(72.33) Knots.plants −1e0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mung Bean, Vigna radiate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“the overlapping treatment (bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizer) resulted in the highest means: number of root nodes, root nodule weight, dry weight of root total, chlorophyll content in leaves and grain yield, (72.33) Knots.plants −1 , (463) gm Plants −1 , (1, 547) gm Plants −1 , (59.14) SPAD, and (3, 531) t ha −1 , respectively, by comparison with comparison treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment gave the highest root nodule weight, 463 gm Plants −1.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizere0
Outcome
root nodule weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
(463) gm Plants −1e0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mung Bean, Vigna radiate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“the overlapping treatment (bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizer) resulted in the highest means: number of root nodes, root nodule weight, dry weight of root total, chlorophyll content in leaves and grain yield, (72.33) Knots.plants −1 , (463) gm Plants −1 , (1, 547) gm Plants −1 , (59.14) SPAD, and (3, 531) t ha −1 , respectively, by comparison with comparison treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment gave the highest root dry weight, 1,547 gm Plants −1.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizere0
Outcome
dry weight of root totale0
Direction
higheste0
Value
(1, 547) gm Plants −1e0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mung Bean, Vigna radiate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“the overlapping treatment (bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizer) resulted in the highest means: number of root nodes, root nodule weight, dry weight of root total, chlorophyll content in leaves and grain yield, (72.33) Knots.plants −1 , (463) gm Plants −1 , (1, 547) gm Plants −1 , (59.14) SPAD, and (3, 531) t ha −1 , respectively, by comparison with comparison treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment gave the highest leaf chlorophyll content, 59.14 SPAD.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll content in leavese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
(59.14) SPADe0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mung Bean, Vigna radiate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“the overlapping treatment (bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizer) resulted in the highest means: number of root nodes, root nodule weight, dry weight of root total, chlorophyll content in leaves and grain yield, (72.33) Knots.plants −1 , (463) gm Plants −1 , (1, 547) gm Plants −1 , (59.14) SPAD, and (3, 531) t ha −1 , respectively, by comparison with comparison treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment gave the highest grain yield, 3,531 t ha −1.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
(3, 531) t ha −1e0
Comparator
comparison treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mung Bean, Vigna radiate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“the overlapping treatment (bacterial inoculum, fungal inoculum, and five t ha −1 organic fertilizer) resulted in the highest means: number of root nodes, root nodule weight, dry weight of root total, chlorophyll content in leaves and grain yield, (72.33) Knots.plants −1 , (463) gm Plants −1 , (1, 547) gm Plants −1 , (59.14) SPAD, and (3, 531) t ha −1 , respectively, by comparison with comparison treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–1130 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

81 papers: 79 positive, 2 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 179 positive, 5 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.