Paper · 2021 · Forests

Establishment of Regional Phytoremediation Buffer Systems for Ecological Restoration in the Great Lakes Basin, USA. II. New Clones Show Exceptional Promise

Andrej Pilipović; Ronald S. Zalesny; Elizabeth R. Rogers; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Poplar tree improvement strategies are needed to enhance ecosystem services’ provisioning and achieve phytoremediation objectives. We evaluated the establishment potential of new poplar clones developed at the University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI) from sixteen phytoremediation buffer systems (phyto buffers) (buffer groups: 2017 × 6; 2018 × 5; 2019 × 5) throughout the Lake Superior and Lake Michigan watersheds. We divided clones into Experimental (testing stage genotypes) and Common (commercial and/or research genotypes) clone groups and compared them with each other and each NRRI clone (NRRI group) at the phyto buffers. We tested for differences in clone groups, phyto buffers, and their interactions for survival, health, height, diameter, and volume from ages one to four years. First-year survival was 97.1%, with 95.5%, 96.2%, and 99.6% for the 2017, 2018, and 2019 buffer groups, respectively. All trees had optimal health. Fourth-year mean annual increment of 2017 buffer group trees ranged from 2.66 ± 0.18 to 3.65 ± 0.17 Mg ha−1 yr−1. NRRI clones ‘99038022’ and ‘9732-31’ exhibited exceptional survival and growth across eleven and ten phyto buffers, respectively, for all years. These approaches advance poplar tree improvement efforts throughout the region, continent, and world, with methods informing clonal selection for multiple end-uses, including phytotechnologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year survival was 97.1%.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Outcome
First-year survivale0
Value
97.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“First-year survival was 97.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year survival was 95.5% for 2017 buffers.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Outcome
survivale1
Value
95.5%e0
Setting
2017e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“95.5%, 96.2%, and 99.6% for the 2017, 2018, and 2019 buffer groups, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“First-year survival was 97.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year survival was 96.2% for 2018 buffers.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Outcome
survivale1
Value
96.2%e0
Setting
2018e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“95.5%, 96.2%, and 99.6% for the 2017, 2018, and 2019 buffer groups, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“First-year survival was 97.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year survival was 99.6% for 2019 buffers.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Outcome
survivale1
Value
99.6%e0
Setting
2019e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“95.5%, 96.2%, and 99.6% for the 2017, 2018, and 2019 buffer groups, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“First-year survival was 97.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–856 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All trees had optimal health.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Outcome
optimal healthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All trees had optimal health.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–974 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourth-year mean annual increment of 2017 buffer trees ranged from 2.66 ± 0.18 to 3.65 ± 0.17 Mg ha−1 yr−1.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Outcome
mean annual incremente0
Value
2.66 ± 0.18 to 3.65 ± 0.17 Mg ha−1 yr−1e0
Setting
2017 buffer groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fourth-year mean annual increment of 2017 buffer group trees ranged from 2.66 ± 0.18 to 3.65 ± 0.17 Mg ha−1 yr−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1088 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone 99038022 showed exceptional survival and growth across eleven buffers.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Material
‘99038022’e0
Outcome
survival and growthe0
Value
elevene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NRRI clones ‘99038022’ and ‘9732-31’ exhibited exceptional survival and growth across eleven and ten phyto buffers, respectively, for all years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1233 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone 9732-31 showed exceptional survival and growth across ten buffers.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Material
‘9732-31’e0
Outcome
survival and growthe0
Value
ten phyto bufferse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NRRI clones ‘99038022’ and ‘9732-31’ exhibited exceptional survival and growth across eleven and ten phyto buffers, respectively, for all years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1233 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors say the evaluation methods inform poplar clone selection for multiple uses.

Taxon
PoplarPopuluse7
Outcome
clonal selection for multiple end-usese0
Value
multiple end-usese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methods informing clonal selection for multiple end-uses, including phytotechnologies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1427 · show in text ↑
e7

“Poplar tree improvement strategies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑