Claim · model-written summary
First-year survival was 95.5% for 2017 buffers.
PopulusNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“95.5%, 96.2%, and 99.6% for the 2017, 2018, and 2019 buffer groups, respectively.”
e1“First-year survival was 97.1%”
e7“Poplar tree improvement strategies”
Title
Andrej Pilipović; Ronald S. Zalesny; Elizabeth R. Rogers; et al. Forests 2021. doi:10.3390/f12040474
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation First-year survival was 97.1%.
- Observation First-year survival was 96.2% for 2018 buffers.
- Observation First-year survival was 99.6% for 2019 buffers.
- Observation All trees had optimal health.
- Observation Fourth-year mean annual increment of 2017 buffer trees ranged from 2.66 ± 0.18 to 3.65 ± 0.17 Mg ha−1 yr−1.
- Observation Clone 99038022 showed exceptional survival and growth across eleven buffers.
- Observation Clone 9732-31 showed exceptional survival and growth across ten buffers.
- Method / resource The authors say the evaluation methods inform poplar clone selection for multiple uses.