Paper · 2021 · Water

Effects of Supplement Irrigation and Nitrogen Application Levels on Soil Carbon–Nitrogen Content and Yield of One-Year Double Cropping Maize in Subtropical Region

Gui-Yang Wang; Yu-Xin Hu; Yong-Xin Liu; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
43
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Inappropriate irrigation conditions and nitrogen application can negatively affect soil carbon–nitrogen content and yield of maize, as well as can lead to underground water pollution and soil degradation. A two year (2018, 2019) field experiment was carried out to determine the effect of irrigation and N, alone and in combination on maize grain yield, grain nitrogen content, soil inorganic N and MBC of one-year double cropping maize (Zea mays L.) in a subtropical region. Split plot design was adopted, with main plots consisting of two water regimes: drip irrigation (drip irrigation to keep soil water content no less than 70% of maximum field capacity) and rainfed (no irrigation during growing period). Split-plot treatments consisted of five nitrogen application levels, including 0 (N0), 150 (N150), 200 (N200), 250 (N250), and 300 kg/ha (N300). The results of two-year field experiment showed that soil irrigation nitrogen interaction had a significant influence on the all measured parameters. In detail, soil NH4+-N and NO3−-N content, total nitrogen (TN), soil organic carbon (SOC) and grain nitrogen contents under the combined treatment of N250 and supplementary irrigation were higher relative to other treatments. Compared with rainfed, maize yield, thousand grains weight (TGW) and harvest index increased by 22.0%, 7.7%, and 15.2% under supplemental irrigation. Yield and TGW N300 were 287 kg/ha and 3.1 g higher than those of N250, and yield and TGW of N250 were 59.4% and 23.1% higher than those of N0, respectively. The yield of spring maize was 24.0% significantly higher than that of autumn maize. Therefore, we suggested that 250 kg/ha nitrogen application fertilizer combined with supplementary irrigation can improve soil fertility and annual maize yield in subtropical one-year double cropping region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen interacted significantly for all measured parameters.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
soil irrigation nitrogen interactione0
Outcome
all measured parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil irrigation nitrogen interaction had a significant influence on the all measured parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N250 with supplementary irrigation gave higher soil ammonium nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen and total nitrogen than other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N250 and supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
soil NH4+-N and NO3−-N content, total nitrogen (TN)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil NH4+-N and NO3−-N content, total nitrogen (TN), soil organic carbon (SOC) and grain nitrogen contents under the combined treatment of N250 and supplementary irrigation were higher relative to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N250 with supplementary irrigation gave higher soil organic carbon than other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N250 and supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
soil organic carbon (SOC)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil NH4+-N and NO3−-N content, total nitrogen (TN), soil organic carbon (SOC) and grain nitrogen contents under the combined treatment of N250 and supplementary irrigation were higher relative to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N250 with supplementary irrigation gave higher grain nitrogen content than other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N250 and supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
grain nitrogen contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil NH4+-N and NO3−-N content, total nitrogen (TN), soil organic carbon (SOC) and grain nitrogen contents under the combined treatment of N250 and supplementary irrigation were higher relative to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation raised maize yield by 22.0% relative to rainfed cropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
supplemental irrigatione0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.0%e0
Comparator
rainfede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with rainfed, maize yield, thousand grains weight (TGW) and harvest index increased by 22.0%, 7.7%, and 15.2% under supplemental irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation raised thousand grain weight by 7.7% relative to rainfed cropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
supplemental irrigatione0
Outcome
thousand grains weight (TGW)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.7%e0
Comparator
rainfede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with rainfed, maize yield, thousand grains weight (TGW) and harvest index increased by 22.0%, 7.7%, and 15.2% under supplemental irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation raised harvest index by 15.2% relative to rainfed cropping.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
supplemental irrigatione0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.2%e0
Comparator
rainfede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with rainfed, maize yield, thousand grains weight (TGW) and harvest index increased by 22.0%, 7.7%, and 15.2% under supplemental irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N300 yield exceeded N250 yield by 287 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N300e0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
287 kg/hae0
Comparator
N250e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and TGW N300 were 287 kg/ha and 3.1 g higher than those of N250”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N300 thousand grain weight exceeded N250 by 3.1 g.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N300e0
Outcome
TGWe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.1 ge0
Comparator
N250e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and TGW N300 were 287 kg/ha and 3.1 g higher than those of N250”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N250 yield exceeded N0 yield by 59.4%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N250e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
59.4%e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and TGW of N250 were 59.4% and 23.1% higher than those of N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N250 thousand grain weight exceeded N0 by 23.1%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N250e0
Outcome
TGWe0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.1%e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and TGW of N250 were 59.4% and 23.1% higher than those of N0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring maize yield was 24.0% higher than autumn maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
yield of spring maizee0
Direction
highere0
Value
24.0%e0
Comparator
autumn maizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of spring maize was 24.0% significantly higher than that of autumn maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1622 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 250 kg/ha nitrogen with supplementary irrigation to improve soil fertility and annual maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
250 kg/ha nitrogen application fertilizer combined with supplementary irrigatione0
Outcome
soil fertility and annual maize yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we suggested that 250 kg/ha nitrogen application fertilizer combined with supplementary irrigation can improve soil fertility and annual maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1782 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 84 positive, 20 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.