Paper · 2020 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Nodulation, weed flora and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata) influenced by use of herbicides

Varsha Gupta; Ekta Joshi; Deep Singh Sasode; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2016 and 2017 at Research Farm, College of Agriculture, RVSKVV, Gwalior (MP) to determine the most effective herbicide/combination of herbicides to control the problematic weeds in greengram. The experiment was laid out with 10 treatments, viz quizalofop-p-ethyl 50, 75 & 100 g/ha PoE, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl 100 g/ha PoE, pendimethalin 1000 g/ha (PE), pendimethalin + imazethapyr (RM) 750 & 1000 g/ha PE, imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ha PoE, two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and weedy check in a Randomized Block Design. The combination of post-emergence herbicide imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ ha was found to be very efficient in controlling the dominant grassy weeds as well as broad leaved weeds and gave maximum seed yield (993 kg/ha) followed by the cultural method of weed control where two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS have done (983 kg/ha). In respect of nodulation two hand weeding 20 and 40 DAS recorded maximum nodule number of 15.52/plant at 40 DAS followed by the application of imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ha PoE 14.45/plant. The application of imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ha PoE resulted in highest B:C ratio (3.03) and net returns followed by pendimethalin + imazethapyr 750 g/ha PE.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus imazamox controlled dominant grassy and broad leaved weeds efficiently.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ hae0
Interactor
grassy weedse0weed
Second interactor
broad leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
controlling the dominant grassy weeds as well as broad leaved weedse0
Direction
very efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of post-emergence herbicide imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ ha was found to be very efficient in controlling the dominant grassy weeds as well as broad leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus imazamox produced maximum seed yield of 993 kg/ha.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
993 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ ha was found to be very efficient in controlling the dominant grassy weeds as well as broad leaved weeds and gave maximum seed yield (993 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings produced seed yield of 983 kg/ha, following the herbicide combination.

Treatment
two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
followed bye0
Value
983 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by the cultural method of weed control where two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAS have done (983 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“gave maximum seed yield (993 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the maximum nodule number of 15.52 per plant at 40 DAS.

Treatment
two hand weeding 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
15.52/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two hand weeding 20 and 40 DAS recorded maximum nodule number of 15.52/plant at 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus imazamox yielded 14.45 nodules per plant.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ha PoEe0
Outcome
nodule numbere1
Direction
followed bye0
Value
14.45/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by the application of imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ha PoE 14.45/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“recorded maximum nodule number of 15.52/plant at 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus imazamox gave the highest benefit-cost ratio of 3.03 and net returns.

Treatment
imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ha PoEe0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.03e0
Comparator
pendimethalin + imazethapyr 750 g/ha PEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of imazethapyr + imazamox (RM) 80 g/ha PoE resulted in highest B:C ratio (3.03) and net returns followed by pendimethalin + imazethapyr 750 g/ha PE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–45 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Imazethapyr · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

imazamox · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

imazamox · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.