Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Production

NEW GRAFTING METHOD FOR SEEDLESS WATERMELON PLANTS PROPAGATION

A. Khereba; R. Bekhit; A. Kamooh; et al.

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Watermelon Citrullus lanatus is an important vegetable crop grown in Egypt. Seedless watermelon cultivars are preferred by most consumers because of their sweeter taste and lack of hard seeds. The growing costs of seedless watermelon (triploid hybrid watermelon) in Egypt is very expensive because its very expensive seed price, triploid seeds do not germinate well and the less homogenous germination and growth. For this reason, this study aimed to propagate seedless watermelon by developing new pattern of grafting technique for watermelon plants propagation to minimize the amounts of imported watermelon hybrids seeds in general and seedless watermelon in particular and decreasing the cost of seedling production and producing homogenous plants characteristics. Grafting is a method of asexual plant propagation widely used in horticulture. It is most commonly used for the propagation of trees and shrubs grown commercially. While, vegetable crops are often grafted including tomato, pepper, eggplant, cucumber, melon and watermelon. The main advantage of grafting in this case is for diseases resistant rootstocks. The new method of grafting in this study is the first method for using the grafting as a propagation method in vegetable crops. Grafting did not use before this method as a method of propagation in the vegetables and non-woody plants. The new approach of grafting technique is depending on dividing the mother plants from seedless (Chiffon F1) and seeded watermelon (Aswan F1 hybrid) plants which grown in the plastic house conditions after 75 days from transplanting. Three types of cuttings were used as a scions. The first type is the cutting from terminal growing point of the main stem and lateral branches 6-10cm in length 0.45-0.6 cm in diameter, the second type is cutting included two nodes, buds and leaves and the third type is cuttings included one node, bud and leaf for using its as scions and grafting them onto four rootstocks i.e., Lagenaria siceraria, Bottle and Calabash gourd, Pumpkin Cucurbita moschata and Ercole Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata by using the hole insertion method. The experiment was conducted in randomized complete blocks design with three replicates during the season of 2007/2008 including twelve grafting treatments and the control seedless watermelon hybrids were sown without grafting. The obtained results showed that, the Cucurbita rootstocks had a lower survival rate than Lagenaria rootstocks with all types of cuttings. The grafted plants by this technique showed significant increment in most characteristics such as vegetative growth, early and total yield, fruit characteristics, total sugars and reducing or non-reducing sugars as compared with the seedless watermelon without grafting as a control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucurbita rootstocks had lower graft survival than Lagenaria rootstocks.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Cucurbita rootstockse0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
all types of cuttingse0
Comparator
Lagenaria rootstockse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Cucurbita rootstocks had a lower survival rate than Lagenaria rootstocks with all types of cuttings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2395–2499 · show in text ↑
t0

“WATERMELON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased vegetative growth versus ungrafted seedless watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
grafted plants by this techniquee0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
incremente0
Comparator
seedless watermelon without graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grafted plants by this technique showed significant increment in most characteristics such as vegetative growth, early and total yield, fruit characteristics, total sugars and reducing or non-reducing sugars as compared with the seedless watermelon without grafting as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2500–2783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased early and total yield versus ungrafted seedless watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
grafted plants by this techniquee0
Outcome
early and total yielde0
Direction
incremente0
Comparator
seedless watermelon without graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grafted plants by this technique showed significant increment in most characteristics such as vegetative growth, early and total yield, fruit characteristics, total sugars and reducing or non-reducing sugars as compared with the seedless watermelon without grafting as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2500–2783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased fruit characteristics versus ungrafted seedless watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
grafted plants by this techniquee0
Outcome
fruit characteristicse0
Direction
incremente0
Comparator
seedless watermelon without graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grafted plants by this technique showed significant increment in most characteristics such as vegetative growth, early and total yield, fruit characteristics, total sugars and reducing or non-reducing sugars as compared with the seedless watermelon without grafting as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2500–2783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased total sugars versus ungrafted seedless watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
grafted plants by this techniquee0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Direction
incremente0
Comparator
seedless watermelon without graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grafted plants by this technique showed significant increment in most characteristics such as vegetative growth, early and total yield, fruit characteristics, total sugars and reducing or non-reducing sugars as compared with the seedless watermelon without grafting as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2500–2783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased reducing or non-reducing sugars versus ungrafted seedless watermelon.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
grafted plants by this techniquee0
Outcome
reducing or non-reducing sugarse0
Direction
incremente0
Comparator
seedless watermelon without graftinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grafted plants by this technique showed significant increment in most characteristics such as vegetative growth, early and total yield, fruit characteristics, total sugars and reducing or non-reducing sugars as compared with the seedless watermelon without grafting as a control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2500–2783 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Grafting increased watermelon fruit size.

    Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting · 2007 · compared with non-grafted control

    Same directionCited by this paper

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

grafting · survival · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.