Paper · 2020 · Plant Disease Research

Bio-efficacy of different fungicides against Drechslera maydis causing maydis leaf blight of maize

Sanjay Kumar; Mandeep Singh Hunjan; Harleen Kaur

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Maydis leaf blight (MLB), caused by Drechslera maydis, is a disease that significantly affects maize productivity and also deteriorates the value and quality of the grains across the globe. It may cause up to 40% grain yield loss under favourable conditions. The present study was undertaken to work out the efficacy of Saaf 75WP (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP) for the management of MLB under field condition for two seasons Kharif 2015 and 2016. Saaf 75WP was evaluated at three doses (875, 1000, 1125 g ha-1) and compared with standard fungicides (mancozeb 75WP, Carbendazim 50WP, zineb 75WP). Among all the fungicides, Saaf 75WP (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP) at 1000 g ha-1 and 1125 g ha-1 was found highly effective. In the plots sprayed with Saaf 75WP @1000 g/ha or 1125g/ha, the grain yield was recorded to be at par which was significantly more than mancozeb 75WP and zineb 75WP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saaf 75WP (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP) at 1000 and 1125 g ha-1 was the most effective of all the fungicides tested against maydis leaf blight of maize caused by Drechslera maydis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Saaf 75WP (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP) at 1000 g ha-1 and 1125 g ha-1e0
Interactor
Drechslera maydisBipolaris maydist1pathogen
Outcome
highly effectivee0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Comparator
all the fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris maydis
Bipolaris maydis · InteractorDavid B. Langston · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all the fungicides, Saaf 75WP (carbendazim 12%+ mancozeb 63% WP) at 1000 g ha-1 and 1125 g ha-1 was found highly effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drechslera maydis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In plots sprayed with Saaf 75WP at 1000 or 1125 g/ha, grain yield of maize was at par between the two doses and significantly higher than with mancozeb 75WP and zineb 75WP.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Saaf 75WP @1000 g/ha or 1125g/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
mancozeb 75WP and zineb 75WPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the plots sprayed with Saaf 75WP @1000 g/ha or 1125g/ha, the grain yield was recorded to be at par which was significantly more than mancozeb 75WP and zineb 75WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · Bipolaris maydis · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mancozeb · Bipolaris maydis · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.