Abstract
Field experiments/On Farm trial (OFT) were conducted at Farmers field of village, Halsi, Lakhisarai under the supervision of ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, BAU, Bihar, India in 2012-13 and 2013-14.To established a uniform plant stand for the maximum yield and net return ultimately for the drudgery reduction. The experimental trial was laid out in a Randomized block design replicated four times (Number of Farmers) with six treatments comprises of transplanted rice (Farmers practices), system of rice intensification (SRI) square transplanted, DSR- Zero-tillage (dry seeding), direct seeded rice (DSR)- broadcasting (dry seeding), DSR- Drum seeded (dry seeding) and DSR- wet seeded (sprouted seeding). Among the different establishment method, SRI planting significantly influenced the growth, yield attributing characters and yield, but relatively was on par with transplanted rice. The maximum plant height, number of tillers m-2, panicle length, leaf area Index (LAI) , number of filled grains panicle-1, number of unfilled grain panicle-1,test weight, grain yield (5712 kg ha-1), straw yield (7950kg ha-1) and net return (Rs. 50,409.30 ha-1) were recorded under SRI (square transplanted) but which were on par with transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillage while benefit cost ratio were significantly highest (2.56) under DSR- Zero-tillage. Lowest grain yield, straw yield and gross return were observed under DSR- broadcasting and lowest net return were recorded under DSR- wet planted (sprouted seeds) and lowest B:C ratio were found under Transplanted rice. System of rice intensification (SRI) having higher yield followed by puddled transplanted rice, DSR- drum seeder (sprouted seed) and DSR- zero-tillage. DSR- zero-tillage is a viable, long-lasting and appropriate substitute to puddled transplanted rice and to be the most profitable methods with minimize the cost of cultivation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
SRI significantly influenced growth, yield attributes, and yield, with outcomes on par with transplanted rice.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- SRI plantinge0
- Outcome
- growth, yield attributing characters and yielde0
- Comparator
- transplanted ricee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SRI planting significantly influenced the growth, yield attributing characters and yield, but relatively was on par with transplanted rice.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI had maximum plant height, tillers, panicle length, and leaf area index.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRI (square transplanted)e1
- Outcome
- plant height, number of tillers m-2, panicle length, leaf area Index (LAI)e0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillagee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum plant height, number of tillers m-2, panicle length, leaf area Index (LAI)”
e1“under SRI (square transplanted) but which were on par with transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillage”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI had maximum filled grains, unfilled grains, and test weight.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRI (square transplanted)e2
- Outcome
- number of filled grains panicle-1, number of unfilled grain panicle-1,test weighte0
- Direction
- maximume1
- Comparator
- transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillagee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“number of filled grains panicle-1, number of unfilled grain panicle-1,test weight”
e1“The maximum plant height”
e2“under SRI (square transplanted) but which were on par with transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillage”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI had maximum grain yield of 5712 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRI (square transplanted)e2
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 5712 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillagee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (5712 kg ha-1)”
e1“The maximum plant height”
e2“under SRI (square transplanted) but which were on par with transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillage”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI had maximum straw yield of 7950kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRI (square transplanted)e2
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 7950kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillagee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“straw yield (7950kg ha-1)”
e1“The maximum plant height”
e2“under SRI (square transplanted) but which were on par with transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillage”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
SRI had maximum net return of Rs. 50,409.30 ha-1.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- SRI (square transplanted)e2
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- Rs. 50,409.30 ha-1e0
- Comparator
- transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillagee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“net return (Rs. 50,409.30 ha-1)”
e1“The maximum plant height”
e2“under SRI (square transplanted) but which were on par with transplanted rice and DSR- Zero-tillage”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
DSR zero-tillage had the highest benefit-cost ratio at 2.56.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- DSR- Zero-tillagee0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.56e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit cost ratio were significantly highest (2.56) under DSR- Zero-tillage”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
DSR broadcasting had the lowest grain yield, straw yield, and gross return.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- DSR- broadcastinge0
- Outcome
- grain yield, straw yield and gross returne0
- Direction
- Loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lowest grain yield, straw yield and gross return were observed under DSR- broadcasting”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
DSR wet planting had the lowest net return.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- DSR- wet planted (sprouted seeds)e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest net return were recorded under DSR- wet planted (sprouted seeds)”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplanted rice had the lowest benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- Transplanted ricee0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest B:C ratio were found under Transplanted rice”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend DSR zero-tillage as a profitable substitute for puddled transplanted rice that lowers cultivation cost.
- Taxon
- RiceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- DSR- zero-tillage is a viable, long-lasting and appropriate substitute to puddled transplanted ricee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“DSR- zero-tillage is a viable, long-lasting and appropriate substitute to puddled transplanted rice and to be the most profitable methods with minimize the cost of cultivation.”
t0“Rice (Oryza Sativa L.)”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
223 papers more in this group
See all 227 papers →irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
725 papers more in this group
See all 729 papers →transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1,074 papers more in this group
See all 1,078 papers →irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.