Paper · 2021 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Effects of Flower Cluster Tip Removal on Phenolics and Antioxidant Activity of Grape Berries and Wines

Menglong Liu; Yichao Song; Hongyong Liu; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Insufficient sunlight during veraison to maturity of winegrapes is a primary factor that inhibits production of phenolic compounds. In this study, a novel thinning technique called cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes, and the berry composition, phenolic profiles, and antioxidant activities of berry skins and wines were determined. CTR of inflorescences reduced cluster compactness, lowered titratable acidity, and increased total soluble solids in berries. CTR also increased concentrations of total phenolics, anthocyanins, tannins, and flavonoids in the pedicel end of berry skins and enhanced concentrations of 12 phenolic compounds. It also increased the concentrations of total flavanols and anthocyanins in wines. CTR berries and wines also had increased antioxidant capacities. Finally, expression of phenolic-related genes was upregulated in the skin of CTR berries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster tip removal reduced cluster compactness of Marselan grapes.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Outcome
cluster compactnesse2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e2

“CTR of inflorescences reduced cluster compactness, lowered titratable acidity, and increased total soluble solids in berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster tip removal lowered titratable acidity of berries.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Outcome
titratable aciditye2
Direction
lowerede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e2

“CTR of inflorescences reduced cluster compactness, lowered titratable acidity, and increased total soluble solids in berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster tip removal increased total soluble solids in berries.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Outcome
total soluble solidse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e2

“CTR of inflorescences reduced cluster compactness, lowered titratable acidity, and increased total soluble solids in berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster tip removal increased total phenolics, anthocyanins and tannins in the pedicel end of berry skins.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Organ / stage
pedicel end of berry skinse3
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Outcome
total phenolics, anthocyanins, tanninse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e3

“CTR also increased concentrations of total phenolics, anthocyanins, tannins, and flavonoids in the pedicel end of berry skins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster tip removal increased flavonoids in the pedicel end of berry skins.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Organ / stage
pedicel end of berry skinse3
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Outcome
flavonoidse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e3

“CTR also increased concentrations of total phenolics, anthocyanins, tannins, and flavonoids in the pedicel end of berry skins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster tip removal enhanced the concentrations of 12 phenolic compounds in berry skins.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Outcome
concentrations of 12 phenolic compoundse4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e4

“enhanced concentrations of 12 phenolic compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster tip removal increased total flavanols and anthocyanins in wines.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Outcome
total flavanols and anthocyaninse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e5

“It also increased the concentrations of total flavanols and anthocyanins in wines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berries and wines from cluster tip removal had increased antioxidant capacities.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Outcome
antioxidant capacitiese6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e6

“CTR berries and wines also had increased antioxidant capacities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenolic-related gene expression was upregulated in the skin of cluster tip removal berries.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Marselane1
Organ / stage
skine7
Treatment
cluster tip removal (CTR)e1
Gene
phenolic-related genese7
Outcome
expressione7
Direction
upregulatede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“cluster tip removal (CTR) was applied to inflorescences of Vitis vinifera L. Marselan grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–273 · show in text ↑
e7

“expression of phenolic-related genes was upregulated in the skin of CTR berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–932 · show in text ↑

cluster · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

cluster · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.