Paper · 1999 · eScholarship@McGill (McGill)

The optical properties of paper and polyethylene mulches and their effect on growth and development of head lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), on microclimate modification and weed control in organic soil /

Brault, Dominique, 1972-

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Lettuce plants (Lactuca sativa L. var. Ithaca) were transplanted on different beige and black paper mulches and on a coextruded white/black polyethylene mulch in organic soil in 1997 and 1998. Non-weeded and weeded control plots were also used. Plant mortality in 1997 for plants grown on bare soil was 10 to 15% greater than that of mulched plants. Head weight was found to be 3.6 times (1997) and 12 times (1998) greater for lettuce grown on mulch compared with a weeded control. The transmission, reflection and absorption of light of the white/black polyethylene mulch and black paper mulch remained stable over the course of the experiment while those of the other papers changed over time. Paper mulch decomposition occurred during the experiment. Although, black paper mulch was the only mulch that gave complete control of weed growth, weed populations present under the beige papers were too small in terms of the size and number of weeds to cause lettuce yield reduction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bare soil had 10 to 15% greater lettuce mortality than mulch in 1997.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
bare soile0
Outcome
Plant mortalitye0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10 to 15%e0
Qualifier
1997e0
Comparator
mulched plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant mortality in 1997 for plants grown on bare soil was 10 to 15% greater than that of mulched plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased lettuce head weight 3.6 times relative to weeded control in 1997.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
Head weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
3.6 timese0
Qualifier
1997e0
Comparator
a weeded controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Head weight was found to be 3.6 times (1997) and 12 times (1998) greater for lettuce grown on mulch compared with a weeded control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased lettuce head weight 12 times relative to weeded control in 1998.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
Head weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
12 timese0
Qualifier
1998e0
Comparator
a weeded controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Head weight was found to be 3.6 times (1997) and 12 times (1998) greater for lettuce grown on mulch compared with a weeded control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–481 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optical properties of white/black polyethylene mulch and black paper mulch remained stable.

Treatment
white/black polyethylene mulch and black paper mulche0
Outcome
transmission, reflection and absorption of lighte0
Direction
remained stablee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The transmission, reflection and absorption of light of the white/black polyethylene mulch and black paper mulch remained stable over the course of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–644 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optical properties of other paper mulches changed over time.

Outcome
those of the other paperse0
Direction
changede0
Qualifier
over timee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“while those of the other papers changed over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–695 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paper mulch decomposed during the experiment.

Outcome
Paper mulch decompositione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Paper mulch decomposition occurred during the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black paper mulch completely controlled weed growth.

Treatment
black paper mulche0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
complete controle0
Comparator
the only mulche0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“black paper mulch was the only mulch that gave complete control of weed growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–842 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds under beige papers were too few and small to reduce lettuce yield.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
beige paperse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
lettuce yield reductione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed populations present under the beige papers were too small in terms of the size and number of weeds to cause lettuce yield reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–981 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mulching · weed · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.