Paper · 2021 · Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Resource-saving methods of fodder crop cultivation in the Trans-Baikal Territory

N. G. Pilipenko; O. T. Andreeva; L. P. Sidorova; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The results of the study on the comparative assessment of different tillage methods in the field crop rotation with different levels of mineral nutrition (N 30 P 30 and N 60 P 30 kg of active ingredient/ ha) are presented. The experiment was carried out on low-humus low-carbonate chernozem of the forest-steppe zone of Eastern Trans-Baikal Territory in 2012–2014. The zoned variety of Buryatskaya-79 spring wheat, and Metis oat variety were used for sowing. Low-cost methods of soil tillage were studied, providing for the preservation and improvement of soil fertility, an increase in the productivity of grain and fodder crops, and a decrease in material and energy costs. Replacement of the basic tillage with a PN-4-35 plow with a ring roller in the third and fourth crop rotation fields by surface tillage with a Stepnyak-7.4 cultivator and direct sowing on the stubble with a PPM Ob4-ZT seeder when applying mineral fertilizers at a rate of N 60 P 30 kg of active ingredient/ha had a positive effect on the condition of the soil. The following indicators of soil fertility were achieved: structural coefficient 1.28–1.38, organic matter content 3.15–3.33%, productive moisture content in the 0–50 cm layer 29.2–31.8 mm, the release of carbon dioxide 1.810–1.969 kg per 1 hour, the content of Р 2 О 5 in the 0–20 cm layer 71–96 mg/kg of soil, the content of K 2 O – 57–82 mg/kg of soil. An increase in the yield of oat grain of 0.16–0.21 t/ha, the green mass of annual grasses of 3.44.0 t/ha, the collection of feed units of 0.32–0.34 t/ha, a reduction in the cost of fuel and lubricants by 31.2-36.4%, and an increase in profitability by 25.0–40.3% were achieved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternative tillage with fertilizer improved soil condition.

Taxon
Metis oate1
Treatment
surface tillage with a Stepnyak-7.4 cultivator and direct sowing on the stubble with a PPM Ob4-ZT seeder when applying mineral fertilizers at a rate of N 60 P 30 kg of active ingredient/hae0
Outcome
condition of the soile0
Direction
positive effecte0
Comparator
basic tillage with a PN-4-35 plow with a ring rollere0

Verbatim

e0

“Replacement of the basic tillage with a PN-4-35 plow with a ring roller in the third and fourth crop rotation fields by surface tillage with a Stepnyak-7.4 cultivator and direct sowing on the stubble with a PPM Ob4-ZT seeder when applying mineral fertilizers at a rate of N 60 P 30 kg of active ingredient/ha had a positive effect on the condition of the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“Metis oat variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil structural coefficient reached 1.28–1.38.

Taxon
Metis oate1
Outcome
structural coefficiente0
Value
1.28–1.38e0

Verbatim

e0

“structural coefficient 1.28–1.38”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1127 · show in text ↑
e1

“Metis oat variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter reached 3.15–3.33%.

Taxon
Metis oate1
Outcome
organic matter contente0
Value
3.15–3.33%e0

Verbatim

e0

“organic matter content 3.15–3.33%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Metis oat variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil productive moisture reached 29.2–31.8 mm.

Taxon
Metis oate1
Outcome
productive moisture contente0
Value
29.2–31.8 mme0

Verbatim

e0

“productive moisture content in the 0–50 cm layer 29.2–31.8 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“Metis oat variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat grain yield increased by 0.16–0.21 t/ha.

Treatment
surface tillagee1
Outcome
yield of oat graine0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.16–0.21 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in the yield of oat grain of 0.16–0.21 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1448 · show in text ↑
e1

“surface tillage with a Stepnyak-7.4 cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual grass green mass increased by 3.44.0 t/ha.

Taxon
annual grassese0
Treatment
surface tillagee1
Outcome
green mass of annual grassese0
Value
3.44.0 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the green mass of annual grasses of 3.44.0 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1497 · show in text ↑
e1

“surface tillage with a Stepnyak-7.4 cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feed units increased by 0.32–0.34 t/ha.

Treatment
surface tillagee2
Outcome
collection of feed unitse0
Value
0.32–0.34 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the collection of feed units of 0.32–0.34 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1545 · show in text ↑
e1

“oat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1430 · show in text ↑
e2

“surface tillage with a Stepnyak-7.4 cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fuel and lubricant costs fell by 31.2-36.4%.

Treatment
surface tillagee2
Outcome
cost of fuel and lubricantse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
31.2-36.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a reduction in the cost of fuel and lubricants by 31.2-36.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1607 · show in text ↑
e1

“oat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1430 · show in text ↑
e2

“surface tillage with a Stepnyak-7.4 cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profitability increased by 25.0–40.3%.

Treatment
surface tillagee2
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
25.0–40.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in profitability by 25.0–40.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1655 · show in text ↑
e1

“oat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1430 · show in text ↑
e2

“surface tillage with a Stepnyak-7.4 cultivator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–842 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.