Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Integrated Crop Management on Yield and Economics of Mango through Frontline Demonstration in Tumkuru District, Karnataka, India

Nagappa Desai Nagaraja Kusagur; Chandru Patil K. R. Shreenivasa

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of integrated crop management on yield and economics of mango through frontline demonstration at farmer’s field of Tumkuru district, Karnataka state during the year from 2017-18 to 2019-20. The data revealed that the total yield gap between potential yield and actual yield of mango was 37.25 per cent, in which 16.00 per cent of yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield and 21.25 per cent of technological gap. The maximum number of farmers was adopted growing legumes as intercropping (86.67 %) followed by recommended quantity of farm yard manure application (83.33%), The increased in adoption per cent of package of practices were found to more in of mango special spraying (56.67 %) and growth regulators spaying (46.67 %). There was significantly increased the yield of mango (25.50 %) after conducted the frontline demonstration programme. The net return and B:C ratio were found to increased in demonstrated plot as compared to farmers practice. The adoption of different package of practices even though after demonstrations programme, which shows positive impact of integrated crop management on yield and economics of mango through adoption of demonstrated technology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The total potential-to-actual mango yield gap was 37.25%.

Outcome
total yield gape0
Value
37.25 per cente0
Comparator
potential yield and actual yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total yield gap between potential yield and actual yield of mango was 37.25 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–312 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The demonstration-to-farmer plot yield gap was 16.00%.

Outcome
yield gape0
Value
16.00 per cente0
Comparator
demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yielde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“16.00 per cent of yield gap between demonstration plot and actual farmers plot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended farm yard manure was adopted by 83.33% of farmers.

Outcome
farm yard manure applicatione0
Value
83.33%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“recommended quantity of farm yard manure application (83.33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adoption of mango special spraying increased by 56.67%.

Outcome
mango special sprayinge0
Value
56.67 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mango special spraying (56.67 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango yield increased significantly by 25.50% after the demonstration.

Treatment
frontline demonstration programmee0
Outcome
yield of mangoe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.50 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased the yield of mango (25.50 %) after conducted the frontline demonstration programme”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return increased in demonstration plots relative to farmer practice.

Treatment
demonstrated plote0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The net return and B:C ratio were found to increased in demonstrated plot as compared to farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefit-cost ratio increased in demonstration plots relative to farmer practice.

Treatment
demonstrated plote0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
farmers practicee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The net return and B:C ratio were found to increased in demonstrated plot as compared to farmers practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–990 · show in text ↑