Abstract
In this study, the effects of different type of mulches viz., Green fern foliage, Mixed forest litter (Alnus nepalensis leaves and Rhododendron leaves), Dry walnut litter and without mulching (control), Manures viz., Goat manure and FYM, and bio-fertilizers namely Trichoderma asperellium, and Pseudomonas fluorescence on the growth and yield characters of garlic were observed in a field experiment. Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence and Mixed forest litter, FYM and Trichoderma asperellium increased the bulb yield and yield components, irrespective of their duration. The treatment Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence performed better than other treatment in respect of fresh weight of bulb, dry weight of bulb, fresh weight of individual clove, dry weight of individual clove, width of bulb, width of individual cloves and numbers of cloves per bulb. Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence is recommended for the garlic production based on better performance than the others and also for being cheaper and abundant in the nature
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence increased garlic bulb yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- garlic
Allium sativumt0 - Treatment
- Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescencee0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescencee0other
- Outcome
- bulb yield and yield componentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence and Mixed forest litter, FYM and Trichoderma asperellium increased the bulb yield and yield components, irrespective of their duration.”
t0“GARLIC”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed forest litter, FYM and Trichoderma asperellium increased garlic bulb yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- Mixed forest litter, FYM and Trichoderma asperelliume0
- Interactor
- Trichoderma asperelliume0other
- Outcome
- bulb yield and yield componentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence and Mixed forest litter, FYM and Trichoderma asperellium increased the bulb yield and yield components, irrespective of their duration.”
t0“GARLIC”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence performed better than other treatments for bulb fresh and dry weight and individual clove fresh weight.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescencee0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescencee0other
- Outcome
- fresh weight of bulb, dry weight of bulb, fresh weight of individual clovee0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
- Comparator
- other treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence performed better than other treatment in respect of fresh weight of bulb, dry weight of bulb, fresh weight of individual clove, dry weight of individual clove, width of bulb, width of individual cloves and numbers of cloves per bulb.”
t0“GARLIC”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence performed better than other treatments for individual clove dry weight and bulb and clove width.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescencee0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescencee0other
- Outcome
- dry weight of individual clove, width of bulb, width of individual clovese0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
- Comparator
- other treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence performed better than other treatment in respect of fresh weight of bulb, dry weight of bulb, fresh weight of individual clove, dry weight of individual clove, width of bulb, width of individual cloves and numbers of cloves per bulb.”
t0“GARLIC”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence performed better than other treatments for cloves per bulb.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescencee0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescencee0other
- Outcome
- numbers of cloves per bulbe0
- Direction
- performed bettere0
- Comparator
- other treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence performed better than other treatment in respect of fresh weight of bulb, dry weight of bulb, fresh weight of individual clove, dry weight of individual clove, width of bulb, width of individual cloves and numbers of cloves per bulb.”
t0“GARLIC”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence for garlic production.
- Taxon
- garlicAllium sativume0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescencee0other
- Outcome
- Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence is recommended for the garlic productione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mixed forest litter, FYM and Pseudomonas fluorescence is recommended for the garlic production based on better performance than the others and also for being cheaper and abundant in the nature”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Pseudomonas · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Pseudomonas · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
162 papers more in this group
See all 166 papers →fertilization · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
95 papers more in this group
See all 99 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.