Abstract
A field experiment was conducted from August 2008 to January 2009 at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to find out the influence of foliar nutrition on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and economics of Bt cotton. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD), replicated thrice. The treatments were T1- Urea - (1.5 %), T2- Diammonium phosphate (DAP) - (2 %), T3- Potassium chloride (KCl) - (2 %), T4- Potassium nitrate (KNO3) - (3%), T5 - Potassium sulphate (K2SO4) - (1.5 %), T6- Polyfeed – (1.5 %) + Multi K - (1.5 %), T7- ZincSulphate (ZnSO4) – (0.5 %), T8- Boron (solubar) - (0.2 %), T9- Control. The results revealed that foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher growth, yield (2758 kg ha-1), nutrient uptake and economics.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Polyfeed plus Multi K significantly increased growth of Bt cotton.
- Taxon
- Bt Cottont0
- Treatment
- foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %)e1
- Outcome
- growthe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Setting
- Coimbatoree0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Bt Cotton”
e0“A field experiment was conducted from August 2008 to January 2009 at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore”
e1“The results revealed that foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher growth, yield (2758 kg ha-1), nutrient uptake and economics”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Polyfeed plus Multi K significantly increased yield of Bt cotton to 2758 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- Bt Cottont0
- Treatment
- foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %)e1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 2758 kg ha-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Bt Cotton”
e1“The results revealed that foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher growth, yield (2758 kg ha-1), nutrient uptake and economics”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Polyfeed plus Multi K significantly increased nutrient uptake of Bt cotton.
- Taxon
- Bt Cottont0
- Treatment
- foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %)e1
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Bt Cotton”
e1“The results revealed that foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher growth, yield (2758 kg ha-1), nutrient uptake and economics”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Polyfeed plus Multi K significantly increased economics of Bt cotton.
- Taxon
- Bt Cottont0
- Treatment
- foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %)e1
- Outcome
- economicse1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Bt Cotton”
e1“The results revealed that foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher growth, yield (2758 kg ha-1), nutrient uptake and economics”
The same questions in other papers
application · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
111 papers more in this group
See all 115 papers →application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.