Abstract
This study was carried out get knowledge about fungicidal properties of vegetable extracts to the control of the pathogenyc fungi (Colletotrichum musae and Botrytis cinerea) in banana (Musa sapientum) and strawberry (Fragaria sp) during the pos harvest storage, at the National University of Colombia headquarters in Palmira. Ethanolics extracts of the following vegetable species were evaluated: Plantago major L, Ruta graveolens L, Lippia alba (Mill) NE BROS), Pteridium aquilinum (Kaulf) Maxon. The extracts were obtained by the percolation method starting from the macerated material (100 g) and 1000 ml of solvent. The fungi was isolated from the strawberry (Fragaria sp) affected by B. cinerea and banana Gross mitchel affected by C. musae. To evaluate the control of the fungi C. musae and B. cinerea sixteen treatments were used (four extracts of plants, two extraction media, two dilutions and three repetitions). Three control treatments were added: absolute (PDA); solvent (PDA + ethanol or water); and chemical (PDA + chemical fungicide). The dilutions were prepared with the solvent used to obtain the extract. The evaluation in vitro was maid with ethanolics extracts diluted at 25%, because these presented the best results in the previous tests. The results indicate that the ethanolic solvent decreased the development of the fungi in 68%. The fruits in which the etanolic extract of ruda and pronto alivio was applied presented bigger incidence and grade of severity. Keys words: Vegetable extract; patogenic fungi; Colletotrichum musae; Botrytis cinérea; post harvest En la Universidad Nacional de Colombia -Sede Palmira, se obtuvieron extractos etanólicos (1.000 ml), macerados (100 g) de llantén (Plantago major L), ruda (Ruta graveolens L), pronto alivio [Lippia alba (Mill) NE BROS] y helecho marranero [Pteridium aquilinum (Kaulf) Maxon]. Para la evaluación del control de C. musae y B. cinerea se utilizaron dieciséis tratamientos (cuatro extractos de plantas, dos medios de extracción, dos diluciones y tres repeticiones).Se adicionaron tres testigos: absoluto (PDA); solvente (PDA + etanol o agua); y químico (PDA + fungicida químico). Las diluciones se realizaron con el solvente de obtención del extracto. La evaluación in vivo se realizó con extractos etanólicos diluidos al 25%. El solvente etanólico disminuyó el desarrollo de los hongos en 68%. Los frutos donde se aplicó el extracto de ruda y pronto alivio presentaron mayor incidencia y grado de severidad. Palabras claves: Plantago major; Ruta graveolens; Lippia alba; Pteridium aquilinum; Colletotrichum musae; Botrytis cinérea; Manejo poscosecha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
The ethanolic solvent reduced the development of the fungi by 68% in vitro.
- Taxon
- bananae0
- Treatment
- ethanolic solvente1
- Outcome
- development of the fungie1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Value
- 68%e1
- Setting
- in vitroe2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“The results indicate that the ethanolic solvent decreased the development of the fungi in 68%”
e2“The evaluation in vitro was maid with ethanolics extracts diluted at 25%”
e0“in banana (Musa sapientum) and strawberry (Fragaria sp)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit treated with the ethanolic extract of ruda and pronto alivio had bigger incidence and grade of severity.
- Taxon
- bananae0
- Treatment
- etanolic extract of ruda and pronto alivioe3
- Outcome
- incidence and grade of severitye3
- Direction
- biggere3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“The fruits in which the etanolic extract of ruda and pronto alivio was applied presented bigger incidence and grade of severity”
e0“in banana (Musa sapientum) and strawberry (Fragaria sp)”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · disease · MusaPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.