Paper · 2021 · Journal of Food Process Engineering

Quality changes kinetic of tomato during transportation and storage

Mai Al‐Dairi; Pankaj B. Pathare; Rashid Al‐Yahyai

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Kinetic models were performed to investigate the quality changes of tomatoes. The samples were transported from three different distances (100, 154, and 205 km), and then stored at a temperature of 10 and 22°C. Physical (weight loss, color, and firmness), chemical (titratable acidity (TA), total soluble solids (TSSs), sugar/acid ratio, and pH), and nutritional (total lycopene and carotenoids) quality parameters of tomato were measured for 12 days of storage. Transportation of tomatoes from the long‐distance transportation and storage at 22°C resulted in a higher increase in weight loss, redness, color index, total lycopene, and carotenoids, and a higher decrease in firmness, color lightness, TA, and so forth. The results showed that the quality changes were well described by the zero‐order kinetic model (with a coefficient of determination R 2 = values of .9993–.8400). Weight loss, total lycopene, and carotenoids were adequately fitted with the zero‐order kinetic model, where TSSs and most firmness experimental values were successfully fitted with the first‐order kinetic model. In all cases, the reaction rate constant ( k ) was higher at 22°C storage temperature compared to storage at 10°C. To validate the appropriateness of the selected models, weight loss, firmness, some color parameters, TA, and total lycopene were taken as examples. All the experimental and predicted data showed a strong agreement. Overall, the results of this study could help the distributors, processors, and consumers to identify the storage time and the ideal edible time. Practical applications The practical application obtainable from our research is the classification of fresh produce based on their maturity stage is required to select the suitable packaging with high strength material during long‐distance transportation. Also, the practical objective of the study is to improve refrigeration storage condition of tomato or many other fresh produce after transportation in the industrial field to maintain its quality attributes for long time. In particular, the proposed study establishes the correlation between transport distance, storage temperature, and duration and the quality attributes of tomato to obtain a mathematical model to predict the quality changes during storage and to assess the effect of transport distance on tomato. The knowledge of such type of data can help to develop an advanced supply chain strategies like transporting, storage, and routing policies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-distance transport and 22°C storage increased weight loss, redness, and color index.

Treatment
long‐distance transportation and storage at 22°Ce0
Outcome
weight loss, redness, color indexe0
Direction
higher increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transportation of tomatoes from the long‐distance transportation and storage at 22°C resulted in a higher increase in weight loss, redness, color index, total lycopene, and carotenoids, and a higher decrease in firmness, color lightness, TA, and so forth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-distance transport and 22°C storage increased total lycopene and carotenoids.

Treatment
long‐distance transportation and storage at 22°Ce0
Outcome
total lycopene, and carotenoidse0
Direction
higher increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transportation of tomatoes from the long‐distance transportation and storage at 22°C resulted in a higher increase in weight loss, redness, color index, total lycopene, and carotenoids, and a higher decrease in firmness, color lightness, TA, and so forth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-distance transport and 22°C storage decreased firmness, color lightness, and titratable acidity.

Treatment
long‐distance transportation and storage at 22°Ce0
Outcome
firmness, color lightness, TAe0
Direction
higher decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transportation of tomatoes from the long‐distance transportation and storage at 22°C resulted in a higher increase in weight loss, redness, color index, total lycopene, and carotenoids, and a higher decrease in firmness, color lightness, TA, and so forth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–727 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-order kinetics described tomato quality changes with reported R² values of .9993–.8400.

Outcome
quality changes were well describede0
Value
.9993–.8400e0
Comparator
zero‐order kinetic modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the quality changes were well described by the zero‐order kinetic model (with a coefficient of determination R 2 = values of .9993–.8400).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero-order kinetics adequately fit weight loss, total lycopene, and carotenoids.

Outcome
Weight loss, total lycopene, and carotenoids were adequately fittede0
Comparator
zero‐order kinetic modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weight loss, total lycopene, and carotenoids were adequately fitted with the zero‐order kinetic model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-order kinetics fit total soluble solids and most firmness measurements.

Outcome
TSSs and most firmness experimental values were successfully fittede0
Comparator
first‐order kinetic modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TSSs and most firmness experimental values were successfully fitted with the first‐order kinetic model.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The kinetic reaction rate constant was higher at 22°C than at 10°C.

Treatment
22°C storage temperaturee0
Outcome
reaction rate constant ( k )e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
storage at 10°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all cases, the reaction rate constant ( k ) was higher at 22°C storage temperature compared to storage at 10°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Experimental and predicted quality values agreed strongly.

Outcome
experimental and predicted data showed a strong agreemente0
Comparator
predicted datae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the experimental and predicted data showed a strong agreement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

158 papers: 141 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 141 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

154 papers more in this group

See all 158 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.