Paper · 2021 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Sources and doses of nitrogen in plant cane production and residual effect on the first ratoon of sugarcane in a savannah Red Oxisol

Flávio Henrique Ferreira Gomes; Frederico Antonio Loureiro Soares; Marconi Batista Teixeira; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The expansion of sugarcane cultivation, especially in areas with low natural soil fertility, such as savannah regions, requires greater efficiency in the application of nutrients, mainly nitrogen (N). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of the application of different sources and doses of nitrogen on the dry matter yield and productivity of sugarcane in the plant cane cycle and the residual effect of such application on the first ratoon cycle of sugarcane (var. SP80-1816) cultivated in a dystrophic Red Oxisol. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design analyzed in a factorial scheme of 2 × 4 with three replications. The evaluated factors consisted of two sources of N (ammonium nitrate (AN) and urea (U)) and four doses of N (0, 60, 120 and 180 kg ha-1). Samples of the aerial part of the sugarcane were collected. The structural components of the aerial part were separated, and the leaf dry matter (LDM), stalk dry matter (SDM) and dry matter of the aerial part (DMAP) were analyzed. The productivity of stalks (PS) was determined by weighing all stalks present in the useful area of each plot. In the plant cane cycle, AN resulted in greater gains in the SDM and PS of sugarcane than did U. In the first ratoon cycle, a residual effect was observed in response to N application, which showed an increase in SDM and PS. Under the conditions of this study, to achieve a higher PS in both cycles, the application of 180 kg N ha-1 is recommended

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate increased stalk dry matter more than urea in plant cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
ANe0
Outcome
SDMe0
Direction
greater gainse0
Comparator
Ue0

Verbatim

e0

“In the plant cane cycle, AN resulted in greater gains in the SDM and PS of sugarcane than did U”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate increased stalk productivity more than urea in plant cane.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
ANe0
Outcome
PSe0
Direction
greater gainse0
Comparator
Ue0

Verbatim

e0

“In the plant cane cycle, AN resulted in greater gains in the SDM and PS of sugarcane than did U”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrogen application increased stalk dry matter in the first ratoon.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
SDMe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the first ratoon cycle, a residual effect was observed in response to N application, which showed an increase in SDM and PS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1370 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sources and doses of nitrogen in plant cane production and residual effect on the first ratoon of sugarcane in a savannah Red Oxisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual nitrogen application increased stalk productivity in the first ratoon.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
PSe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the first ratoon cycle, a residual effect was observed in response to N application, which showed an increase in SDM and PS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1370 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sources and doses of nitrogen in plant cane production and residual effect on the first ratoon of sugarcane in a savannah Red Oxisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 180 kg N ha-1 for higher stalk productivity in both cycles.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
180 kg N ha-1e0
Outcome
higher PSe0

Verbatim

e0

“to achieve a higher PS in both cycles, the application of 180 kg N ha-1 is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1494 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sources and doses of nitrogen in plant cane production and residual effect on the first ratoon of sugarcane in a savannah Red Oxisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–132 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

ammonium nitrate · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.