Paper · 2021 · African Journal of Biological Sciences

Influence of sun drying and a combination of boiling and sun drying on the retention of nutrients and bioactive compounds in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp) leaves

Wasswa M. S.; Fungo R.; Kaaya A.; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The nutrients and bioactive compounds retention of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L). Walp) leaves subjected to the two traditional processing methods of sun drying and a combination of boiling and sun drying was investigated. Findings revealed that the retention of carbohydrates (92.72%), proteins (97.41%) and ash (92.39%) was significantly higher among samples that were subjected to sun drying alone, than samples subjected to boiling and sun drying. Considerable reduction in lipids content of sun dried samples (20.24%) and boiled and sundried samples (17.16%) were registered. Significant (p < 0.05) loss of bioactive compounds was registered when fresh leaves were subjected to the two processing methods. For example only 7.13% and 8% of -carotene was retained in boiled and sun-dried samples and in sun dried samples, respectively. Insignificant effect on minerals was observed with more than 92% of Fe, Ca and Zn retained in sun dried and in boiled and sun dried leaves. The study demonstrated that subjecting cowpea leaves to sun drying and a combination of boiling and sun drying, leads to insignificant loss of carbohydrates and proteins but leads to the loss of bioactive compounds. The two processing techniques had insignificant effect on minerals contents. The study results show that drying could be considered for cowpeas preservation, which would contribute to ensuring all year availability of the vegetable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying retained 92.72% carbohydrates, significantly more than boiling plus drying.

Treatment
sun drying alonee0
Outcome
carbohydratese0
Direction
highere0
Value
92.72%e0
Comparator
boiling and sun dryinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“retention of carbohydrates (92.72%), proteins (97.41%) and ash (92.39%) was significantly higher among samples that were subjected to sun drying alone, than samples subjected to boiling and sun drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying retained 97.41% proteins, significantly more than boiling plus drying.

Treatment
sun drying alonee0
Outcome
proteinse0
Direction
highere0
Value
97.41%e0
Comparator
boiling and sun dryinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“retention of carbohydrates (92.72%), proteins (97.41%) and ash (92.39%) was significantly higher among samples that were subjected to sun drying alone, than samples subjected to boiling and sun drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying retained 92.39% ash, significantly more than boiling plus drying.

Treatment
sun drying alonee0
Outcome
ashe0
Direction
highere0
Value
92.39%e0
Comparator
boiling and sun dryinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“retention of carbohydrates (92.72%), proteins (97.41%) and ash (92.39%) was significantly higher among samples that were subjected to sun drying alone, than samples subjected to boiling and sun drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun dried samples had 20.24% lipid reduction.

Treatment
sun driede0
Outcome
lipids contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
20.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable reduction in lipids content of sun dried samples (20.24%) and boiled and sundried samples (17.16%) were registered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiled and sun dried samples had 17.16% lipid reduction.

Treatment
boiled and sundriede0
Outcome
lipids contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
17.16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considerable reduction in lipids content of sun dried samples (20.24%) and boiled and sundried samples (17.16%) were registered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–579 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both processing methods significantly reduced bioactive compounds.

Treatment
the two processing methodse0
Outcome
bioactive compoundse0
Direction
losse0
Value
p < 0.05e0
Comparator
fresh leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant (p < 0.05) loss of bioactive compounds was registered when fresh leaves were subjected to the two processing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boiling and sun drying retained 7.13% of carotene.

Treatment
boiled and sun-driede0
Outcome
-carotenee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
7.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 7.13% and 8% of -carotene was retained in boiled and sun-dried samples and in sun dried samples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sun drying retained 8% of carotene.

Treatment
sun driede0
Outcome
-carotenee0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 7.13% and 8% of -carotene was retained in boiled and sun-dried samples and in sun dried samples, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both processes retained more than 92% of Fe, Ca, and Zn without a significant effect.

Treatment
sun dried and in boiled and sun driede0
Outcome
Fe, Ca and Zne0
Direction
Insignificant effecte0
Value
more than 92%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insignificant effect on minerals was observed with more than 92% of Fe, Ca and Zn retained in sun dried and in boiled and sun dried leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–131 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest drying for cowpea preservation and year-round availability.

Outcome
drying could be considered for cowpeas preservatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drying could be considered for cowpeas preservation, which would contribute to ensuring all year availability of the vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1426 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: sugar starch · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

processing · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.