Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of Milogranite and IBDU fertilizers in combination and alone when applied to creeping bentgrass on a putting green turf. Data was collected on turf quality, colour, uniformity, density, shoot growth, and resistance to disease/ drought stress. Small differences were seen between the treatments especially after the second treatment of fertilizers released nitrogen. Larger differences were seen between fertilized and unfertilized plots. All fertilized plots yielded a positive performance in turf quality, uniformity, and colour. Generally, the IBDU fertilizer treatment provided better results than the Milogrant fertilizer treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment differences were small, particularly after the second nitrogen-releasing fertilizer application.
- Taxon
- Creeping Bentgrass
Agrostis stoloniferat0 - Outcome
- Small differencese0
- Qualifier
- after the second treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Small differences were seen between the treatments especially after the second treatment of fertilizers released nitrogen.”
t0“Creeping Bentgrass”
Claim · model-written summary
Differences between fertilized and unfertilized plots were larger than among fertilizer treatments.
- Taxon
- Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
- Outcome
- Larger differencese0
- Direction
- Largere0
- Comparator
- unfertilized plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Larger differences were seen between fertilized and unfertilized plots.”
t0“Creeping Bentgrass”
Claim · model-written summary
All fertilized plots showed positive turf quality, uniformity and colour.
- Taxon
- Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
- Treatment
- fertilized plotse0
- Outcome
- turf quality, uniformity, and coloure0
- Direction
- positivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All fertilized plots yielded a positive performance in turf quality, uniformity, and colour.”
t0“Creeping Bentgrass”
Claim · model-written summary
IBDU fertilizer generally performed better than Milogrant fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Creeping BentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
- Treatment
- IBDU fertilizer treatmente0
- Outcome
- better resultse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- Milogrant fertilizer treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Generally, the IBDU fertilizer treatment provided better results than the Milogrant fertilizer treatment.”
t0“Creeping Bentgrass”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.