Paper · 2009 · Weed & Turfgrass Science

Effect of the Late Fall Fertilization and Snow Cover Period on Spring Greenup of Creeping Bentgrass at Following Year

Duk-Ho Lee; Jun-Ki Jeon; Young-Kyoo Joo

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the effect of the late fall fertilization applied with methyl urea(MU), compound chemical fertilizer(CF), humate(HM), and organic compost fertilizer(NS) on spring greenup of creeping bentgrass at following year. The plots were treated with various snow cover periods before transforming to ski slopes from golf holes during 2007 fall to 2008 spring. The highest visual quality and greenup rate were shown on MU or HM applications at 10 days before snow cover treatment. The CF treatment which had a highest phosphorus rate was most effective with a 13 cm of root length at the reconversion date to golf hole from ski slope of the following spring. However, the application of CF followed by immediate snow cover showed the worst results on visual quality and green color caused by a leaf burning damage from the residual effect of CF. At least 10 days were required to avoid phytotoxicant from undissolved granular of CF before snow cover practise. The application of NS showed the highest result on leaf dry weight at no snow cover plot in next spring, but not on green color and visual quality. Therefore, the proper interval period of snow cover after late fall fertilization should be an important management skill on the spring greenup of creeping bentgrass on following year transforming from ski slope to golf hole.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MU or HM applied ten days before snow cover gave highest visual quality and greenup rate.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
MU or HM applications at 10 days before snow cover treatmente0
Outcome
visual quality and greenup ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest visual quality and greenup rate were shown on MU or HM applications at 10 days before snow cover treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CF produced the longest roots, 13 cm, at spring reconversion.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
CF treatmente0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
13 cme0
Qualifier
reconversion date to golf hole from ski slope of the following springe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CF treatment which had a highest phosphorus rate was most effective with a 13 cm of root length at the reconversion date to golf hole from ski slope of the following spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CF immediately followed by snow cover had the worst visual quality and green color from leaf burning.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
application of CF followed by immediate snow covere0
Outcome
visual quality and green colore0
Direction
worste0
Qualifier
leaf burning damage from the residual effect of CFe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of CF followed by immediate snow cover showed the worst results on visual quality and green color caused by a leaf burning damage from the residual effect of CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

At least ten days between CF and snow cover were required to avoid phytotoxicity.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Outcome
At least 10 days were required to avoid phytotoxicante0
Value
10 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At least 10 days were required to avoid phytotoxicant from undissolved granular of CF before snow cover practise”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS without snow cover gave the highest next-spring leaf dry weight.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
application of NSe0
Outcome
leaf dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
no snow cover plot in next springe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of NS showed the highest result on leaf dry weight at no snow cover plot in next spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS did not give the highest green color or visual quality.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferat0
Treatment
NSe1
Outcome
green color and visual qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not on green color and visual quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creeping Bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of NS showed the highest result on leaf dry weight at no snow cover plot in next spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1091 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend managing snow cover timing after fall fertilization for spring greenup.

Taxon
creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae0
Outcome
proper interval period of snow cover after late fall fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proper interval period of snow cover after late fall fertilization should be an important management skill on the spring greenup of creeping bentgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1301 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · growth · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.